Changing case from Fraud to Breach of Contract?

Asked about 2 years ago - Madera, CA

I asked for a house to be built and my understanding is that it would be for 100k.
This was a verbal contract.
I paid 50,000.
After the building was finished, the contractor is saying that the cost alone was 200k.
I did not pay anything until they would take some responsibility.
They have sued for fraud for the whole 200k.

Is this fraud?
Or is the breach of contract?
As this case moves forward can they change their attack and say it was breach of contract?
Can a plaintiff change their case in mid stream or they have to file another suit?

Attorney answers (3)

  1. 3

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . Fraud requires an intent to commit fraud, and that can be hard to prove. This could be breach of contract, but this is harder to prove based on an oral agreement without anything in writing since the terms of the contract, from what you describe, seem to be in dispute. If the oral contract is void, or if no contract was formed, there could be a cause of action for "quantum meruit", which basically that the contractor is entitled to the reasonable value of the job; otherwise you would be unjustly enriched. Once the complaint has been answered by the defendant, the plaintiff has to request leave from the court to amend the complaint. These cases are very fact heavy and not so simple, so you should really consult an attorney.

    All information provided is for general purposes only and does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
  2. 3

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . This is probably not fraud, unless they can show that you did not intend to pay them and they relied on it. It may be breach of contract.
    A plaintiff can change their theory of the case and their claims as they go along, it does not require filing another suit.
    If you are being sued, you need to contact an attorney in the area. Try to find one that handles construction cases since you probably have a some defenses that other attorney might not be aware of.

  3. 4

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . I am not licensed in CA, but I think you're asking a great question. Common law fraud requires intent; if you did not intend to commit fraud, then I do not believe the act was created. I would suggest that of you do not have an attorney, you should immediately get one.

    I am licensed in New Mexco and Pennsylvania, and therefore any discussion of issues related to other states must... more

Related Topics

Lawsuits and disputes

If you're faced with a dispute that can't be resolved by negotiation, a lawsuit may be necessary. It will allow you to seek a legally binding solution in court.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.


Ask now

33,803 answers this week

3,717 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

33,803 answers this week

3,717 attorneys answering