This is for failed back surgery with harrington rods that have fractured. After the statute of limitation had passed, surgeon wrote documentation in medical journal that says to the effct.."we now know that many of the prior surgeries for scoliosis are un necassary" many of those recieving complete spinal fusion as mine, have ended up severly disabled. The written practical use of these rods were originally explained as fusion for as many as 6 bvertabret, not total fusion as explained in the patent for these rods. I have pages of documentation collected over the past few years.
I have completed much research and compiled a ledger of information concerning the failure rate of these surgeries and documented medical facts regarding the human experimentations. Surgeries that should have never been, and human subject research that had no follow up, which should have contributed to the success rate curve in the feild. Research suggests that surgeons did not offer adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treatment with rods as an option, but rather as the only option to save the life of the scoliosis patient. It is now common knowlege in the field that scoliosis surgery is not the best option and mostly causes debilitating results. Please take this case.
As soon as possible bring all of your documentation to an experienced medical malpractice attorney to see if you can still make a claim.
Medical Malpractice Attorney
Some states have a law that provides a limited exception to the statute of limitations for fraud. In a medical malpractice scenario, if a doctor purposefully covers up a negligent act, it can sometimes be possible to argue that he/she fraudulently concealed it. I have no idea whether Oregon law has this exception to the limitations period or whether it would factually apply to your case. See a local med mal attorney for the best advice.
This is a complicated question and I am not sure that you could get any sort of an accurate answer unless you have an attorney sit down and go through your medical history and then review the records. Based on the information provided I believe that it would be worth your time to research the issue further. Since timing is at issue I would consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
AVVO DISCLAIMER I am licensed in Minnesota only and my answers on Avvo assume Minnesota law. The answers I provide are for general information only and are NOT INTENDED AS LEGAL ADVICE and therefore must not be relied upon. Legal advice must be based on the interaction between an attorney and client and specific exact facts and the law. I do not retain clients without a signed RETAINER AGREEMENT. The Avvo forum does not allow for the discussion and the interaction necessary to form a complete legal analysis. Therefore the answers given to any specific question would most likely be different if there was attorney-client interaction. The exchange of information through this forum does not establish such an attorney client relationship. An attorney-client relationship is established only by personal and direct consultation with me followed by the execution of a written attorney-client agreement signed by each of us. The communications on this website are not privileged nor are they confidential and I assume no duty to anyone by my participation on Avvo or because I have answered or commented on a question. All legal proceedings involve deadlines and statutory time limiting statutes. So that legal rights are not lost for failure to timely take appropriate action and because I do not provide legal advice in the answers to any question, if you are an interested party you should promptly and personally consult with an qualified attorney for legal advice licensed in the proper jurisdiction. Finally, see Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference.
Personal Injury Lawyer
There is an alternative theory that can start the statute of limitations tolling significantly after the harm in limited instances when actual or constructive knowledge the harm did not occur until later. Therefore, if you could not have known of the harm until a later date, the statute would not start tolling until then. This is a very limited exception and you would need a detailed legal opinion. See a lawyer.
You might still have a claim! In some instances (and some states), statute of limitations begins to run after it is discovered that there was an injury, not from the date of the act. Consult a local personal injury attorney immediately. Usually, the first consultation is free, so you have nothing to lose.
This answer is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should not take action based upon this information without consulting legal counsel. This answer is not intended to create, and does not create, an attorney-client relationship. PLEASE REMEMBER: All claims and legal matters have statutes of limitations and/or other important time periods that apply to them. This means that you must take action on all claims or legal matters within the required time period(s) or your claims could be barred by the statute of limitations or dismissed.