I was pulled over after leaving a bar with my husband. I was told that I was speeding. The office went to the passenger side and asked my husband if he would consent to a field sobriety test. He said no. the officer asked why? and he said "because I am not driving". The officer than placed my husband under arrest for DUII. I was asked to take a field sobriety test and passed. I wasnt given a speeding ticket, citation or even a verbal warnig . We didnt argue with the officer , but this cant be right?
also, my husband told the officer that he would consent to a blood test. But the officer told him that wasnt his right or a choice.
Criminal Defense Attorney
There is no law making a passenger guilty of driving when someone else is clearly in control of the vehicle. It is likely the officer will testify he saw you switching seats, or saw your husband drive at some point.
Answers presented on this website are intended only for informational purposes and any use of the contained material is at the users own risk. Answers are intended exclusively as a public resource for general information, and this information is intended, but is not promised or guaranteed to be, correct, up-to-date, or complete. This material is not intended to constitute legal advice, as an agreement to create an attorney-client relationship with the law offices of Mitchell S. Sexner & Associates LLC, or the provision of legal services, and receipt of this information does not constitute such an agreement. If legal or other specific expert advice is required, then the services of a competent professional should be sought.O
1 lawyer agrees
Personal Injury Lawyer
It sounds like there are some more facts the officer is going from than what is posted, because there is not a DUII based on the facts above. The State must prove your husband was "driving" to prove a DUII case. That element is not met on the above facts. However, if he was sitting on your lap while the vehicle was being operated on a "highway" or vise versa, there is a case that states he was driving for the purposes of DUII. The little details in DUII cases are what the DA is going to attempt to use to show your husband was the driver.
I suspect the officer: 1) received a tip from someone at the bar or another motorist that your husband was driving under the influence, or 2) thought he saw your husband driving prior to initiating the stop, or 3) the officer for whatever reason decided to arrest your husband based on some theory that most likely won't stand up in court. It could be a combination of all three. Whatever the case, it sounds like your husband may have a "no driving" defense.
This is why it is imperative to consult with an attorney after a DUII arrest. The State might not be able to prove their case, so even if your husband is diversion eligible that might not be the best option for him.
Additionally, remember he can fight to prevent a suspension of his driver's license by challenging the DMV Implied consent suspension. He must act quickly though and send in a request for a hearing within 10 days following the arrest. The DMV hearing will provide you valuable insight on why your husband was arrested. However, an attorney should be consulted prior to your husband attending the hearing.
Additionally, from the facts provided it appears your husband did not have a right to take a blood test in lieu of a breath test for DUII purposes. There was no hospitalization or traffic accident. Therefore a breath test was the option. The refusal to take a breath test and asking for a blood test instead can also be construed as a refusal. This may have additional negative consequences for your husband.
This posting does not create an attorney client relationship and is for informational purposes only.
4 lawyers agree
DUI / DWI Attorney
In short, the state must prove driving to convict someone of a DUI.
Legal disclaimer: This message does not constitute legal advice and is for informational purposes only. This message does not establish an attorney-client relationship, which can only be established once a retainer agreement has been fully executed between you and this firm.