Under the law, there has to be a continued effort to catch the suspect,” there wasn't a continued effort hereof. Since the early spring 2012, I am fugitive because of class 2 felony charge had been pressed by ex girl friend. Though it was false accusation. Due to very severe stress I undergone and many other factors, I fled, thereupon the bond was posted. I did not appear on preliminary hearing, therefore was automatically indicted by the Grand without any adversarial procedure. In other words guilty until prove innocence.
The money was lost. Since then I live outside US. Because of nature of the offence I do not rely on impartial trail. That is why I did not surrender. I am indigent consequently.
According to the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, I (accused)
P.S. According to the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, I (accused) shall enjoy the right for the Assistance of Counsel for my defense. The Public defender Lake county representative wrote me via email that I must surrender and applied for public defender. I understand all such statements and advises that are based on internal regulations and certain bylaws. Though essentially a criminal charge is a law matter, therefore there is a firm hierarchy in the Law, particularly in US; US constitution, Six amendment, witch very clearly states that an (accused) shall enjoy the right for the Assistance of Counsel during criminal at all critical stages of due process nothing said that an accused must first surrender et cetera..
Divorce / Separation Lawyer
The only question you asked was about speedy trial, not due diligence. The time has been stayed because you are at fault for the delay due to your flight outside the jurisdiction. If you are indigent, you will be entitled to a public defender if/when you return to face the charges.
I disagree with counsel because under certain circumstances, defendants have been known t be tried in absentia. It is unlikely this will happen in your case but without more facts, we cannot say for sure.
1 found this helpful
1 lawyer agrees
You seemingly logical approach to practical applications of legal concepts comes to a crashing halt by being legally flawed: no matter what internal justifications you present for public reading, the law requires you to answer charges and be tried in court.
Align yourself with a splendid legal professional to complete that criminal matter, otherwise, I am certain of that, your life will encounter more legal complications.
DISCLAIMER The answer given above by the lawyer serves for educational purposes only and provides general information and a basic understanding of the applicable law. Take notice that the answer above does not create an attorney-client relationship as this website is not intended to provide anyone a specific legal advice. Anyone using the site expressly consents that there is no attorney client privilege between any person and any attorney responding. Further take notice that the site should not be used as a crude substitute for any professional and competent legal advice by a licensed professional attorney in the applicable jurisdiction. The attorney above attempted to provide competent professional information, however, the law and its applications may change frequently and vary greatly from other U.S. jurisdictions and locales. Therefore, any information and materials provided above are general in nature, and may not apply to specific factual and legal circumstances related to one's personal legal issues. Contact an experienced lawyer admitted to practice in your State under an attorney-client privilege to further receive a competent legal advice before making any important decisions about your particular legal issue. For further inquiries please contact: Attorney Alexander Ivakhnenko 1021 West Adams, 102, Chicago, Illinois 60607 773-562-8602 http://alexanderivakhnenko.com
1 lawyer agrees