I recently quit my job and started a business with a friend in a field similar to my former job. Whereas my old job had a storefront, I do not. I don't even have an office and I have no start-up capital or any real inventory at present.
My boss found out through acquaintances that I was starting a similar business, and he called me and said that I had broken the law by contacting clients. I did, in fact, contact clients (that I had found myself) to say I was leaving my job. However, I did not sign a non-compete or non-solicitation agreement/contract; but I did sign a confidentiality agreement which addresses trade secrets.
Note that the clients contact info is readily available online and in trade publications.
How do NYC courts rule in such cases as mine?
Based on the information that you have provided it does not appear like your old employer has any right to restrict your new business. If you did not sign a non-compete or confidentiality agreement, he/she/it is out of luck. Keep in mind that even if there is some type of an agreement, the only way he/she/it can stop you is by taking you to court and getting an injunction. In general New York Courts are reluctant to enforce restrictions on a person's ability to earn a living--even when there is an agreement, so I think you are going to be fine.
1 found this helpful
2 lawyers agree
Class Action Attorney
It's impossible to say how a court will rule in a particular case or set of facts. That said, you may be right with respect to the no-compete clause. However, the confidentiality agreement might raise some issues. You should consult with a competent lawyer.
If you do not have a signed retainer fee agreement with Chittur & >Associates, P.C., ("the Firm"), then until such retainer agreement is >entered into, neither the Firm nor any of its attorneys will represent you >nor will they be your attorney in any matter and you remain responsible for >any and all deadlines and for any statutes of limitations that may pertain >to potential claims. No attorney-client relationship exists until such >agreement is entered into; however, communications with the Firm by a >prospective client remain confidential and are considered privileged. >This email may contain confidential and/or privileged material for the sole >use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or >disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the >sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
1 found this helpful
Employment / Labor Attorney
Mr. Kim is correct. However, your former employer may try to show that you breached the duty of loyalty by contacting its clients while still working there, in an effort to solicit future business.
The information provided above is for general purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Seek competent legal representation, because the facts of each case are different.
1 found this helpful
1 lawyer agrees
Commercial Real Estate Attorney
You skillfully did not solicit while you were still at your former job. Bravo. This would have given rise to the likely violation of the good faith provisions in the Business Corporation Law which punish looters of customers or clients with promises of new business at your start-up. The fact that the names are public is not really relevant to your issues. You mention a "similar" business and issues regarding a storefront and inventory. These are not meaningful issues without further context in such a case and without my further analysis of what "similar" means in an objective sense, and whether a case could be made that your prior job endowed you with trade secrets belonging to him. If I were retained by him that is how I would proceed. (By the way, this is how I practice: to put myself in the shoes of my adversary and look at your cases weaknesses.) Another attorney who commented on your predicament seems, I think, too sanguine, regarding the possibility of litigation; while, of course, the personalities here would be a very strong factor in my analysis. Does he want to kill?
I wish you well, and, of course, always answer these questions as hypothetical situations, so that you understand that I am not actually (especially in this public forum) acting as your counselor. Call me anytime.
UNTIL AND UNLESS A RETENTION AGREEMENT IS EXECUTED AND DELIVERED BY BOTH PARTIES TO THIS EMAIL, NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP IS ESTABLISHED BETWEEN ME AND THE PERSON OR PERSONS POSING THESE QUESTIONS.
If the identity of the customers are available through publicly available sources, there is strong argument that you should not be restricted from doing business with them, post-employment. I suggest you consult an attorney, however, to review whatever agreement(s) you signed with your former employer and your situation in general.
PLEASE NOTE: This response is for general purposes only and does not establish an attorney-client relationship, nor is it legal advice. Please consult an attorney for legal advice particular to the circumstances of your situation.