Can I take my bankruptcy attorney to small claims court for legal malpractice due to balance of fees to intended beneficiary?

Asked over 1 year ago - San Diego, CA

My San Diego Ch 7 bankruptcy attorney incorrectly told me (several times) that I only needed to wait 6 months after a $10,000 loan repayment to my mother before filing for BK. (I later discovered it is considered preferential payment if within 12 months prior.)

After the BK discharge, the trustee went after my mother for repayment. My mother (from Wisconsin), has had to hire an attorney who negotiated the amount to $7,500. My mother's attorney then demanded the BK attorney pay this amount as she was an intended beneficiary. He finally agreed to pay $4,000 for her release, which my mother will accept.

When I can, I will repay my mother the balance ($3,500, plus her attorney fees). Can I then take the BK attorney to small claims court for this amount (as well as my fees to him)?

Attorney answers (6)

  1. Matthew Scott Berkus

    Contributor Level 20


    Lawyers agree

    Best Answer
    chosen by asker

    Answered . It is unlikely small claims court would have "subject" matter jurisdiction in this case since the issue has to do with more than simply owing money.

    The thing with malpractice is that it requires more than the attorney making a mistake that they shouldn't have. The client must have relied on the mistake and, here is the key, must have suffered some legal, actionable, and measurable harm. Candidly, as the debtor, you weren't harmed by the attorney's mistake. Strictly speaking, your obligation to pay your mother was discharged in your BK. What happens is, (1) you repaid mom $10,000 for loan 6 months prior to filing BK, which is an insider preference. (2) Mom pays the trustee and goes after the attorney for damages, and appears to have settled the matter. (3) You, by virtue of your BK, have no further debt to Mom. So, your "voluntary" decision to repay is not an actionable harm because your mom has not legal claim against you for payment of this debt.

    Yes, the attorney appears to have made a mistake. But a preference is the problem of the person receiving the preference, not the debtor. So, the debtor rarely has recourse in malpractice for lack of actual harm or damages in a preference issue.

    Keep in mind, preference is just one legal theory upon which the trustee could have used on this issue, had you waited the 12 months, the trustee might have pursued it as a fraudulent conveyance depending on the overall facts.

  2. Steven Keith Brumer


    Contributor Level 10


    Lawyers agree

    Answered . While my esteemed colleague is correct that this does not belong in small claims court, I'd question whether you have any damages as a result of the alleged malpractice. Certainly you were advised incorrectly and your mother suffered as a result but whether you were damaged as a result of your attorney's malpractice remains to be seen. You hired an attorney to obtain a discharge of all of your dischargeable debt. You received that discharge. One of your creditors (your mom) ended up with an unpleasant result but your result was what you bargained for - your discharge. You should most certainly consult with an attorney who specializes in legal malpractice in order to determine whether you should pursue the attorney who mishandled your case.

    My comment here does not create an attorney client relationship with you. I am a debt relief agency. I help... more
  3. Michael Raymond Daymude

    Contributor Level 20


    Lawyers agree

    Answered . IMO, no, you cannot prevail on a claim against your attorney for malpractice or anything else. Any payment you make to your mother is entirely voluntary and as such would not support a claim for damages. Additionally, as pointed out by Mr. Berkus, a preferential transfer is only one theory that could be used to avoid the transfer of the $10,000 to your mother. In many such circumstances, the facts would also support the theory of fraudulent transfer. Your BK attorney has already stepped up to the plate and paid $4,000 for a release which probably includes any claim you might be able to state and/or an indemnification provision. In any and all events, any attempt to prove your claim would surely exceed the $3,500 settlement shortfall.

    I am licensed in California only and my answers on Avvo assume California law. Answers provided by me are for... more
    Matthew Scott Berkus
    Matthew Scott Berkus, Bankruptcy Attorney - Denver, CO
    Posted over 1 year ago.

    Very direct, nice.

    Brian Crozier Whitaker
    Brian Crozier Whitaker, Bankruptcy Attorney - San Diego, CA
    Posted over 1 year ago.

    Mr Daymude is correct. I misread your original post to say that the Trustee, not your attorney, paid the $4,000.

  4. Brian Crozier Whitaker

    Contributor Level 17


    Lawyers agree

    Answered . Small claims court does not usually deal with malpractice and other forms of negligence ... but it's possible. You were clearly given bad advice ... but you would have to prove that waiting another 6 months would have saved the $3500 plus atty fees and would not have cost you at least as much as a result of the delay.

  5. Robert Michael Fox

    Contributor Level 10


    Lawyers agree

    Answered . Consult with a malpractice attorney, however i do not think you have much of a claim here. Your attorney has a duty to you, NOT to your mother, who is an insider creditor. You hired a BK attorney to file your case and achieve a successfull outcome. Did you receive a discharge ? did you suffer any pecuniary damages?

  6. Diane L Gruber


    Contributor Level 18


    Lawyers agree

    Answered . This does not belong in Small Claims Court. Consult with a legal malpractice attorney before you proceed. Good luck.

    Be sure to designate "best answer." If you live in Oregon, you may call me for more detailed advice, 503-650-9662.... more

Related Topics


Bankruptcy is a legal way for people or businesses who are no longer capable of paying back their bills to clear these debts and start over.

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

Chapter 7 bankruptcy is a form of bankruptcy where your debts are canceled, but some of your assets are sold to pay off part of your debt.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.


Ask now

20,195 answers this week

2,587 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

20,195 answers this week

2,587 attorneys answering