I was hired on two days ago at a telemarketing company.
I was fired today for "burning leads", but I was also publicly humiliated when I was fired over the intercom.
Unfortunately, you probably do not have a claim against your employer. If your termination was unrelated to your membership in a protected category (such as age, race, sex, disability, etc...) or some other violation of the law (such as whistleblowing) and you have no employment contract and are not in a union, there's probably no claim.
State, Local, and Municipal Law Attorney
Not the best way to go about terminating your employment and I certainly understand how it could be embarrassing, but you were most likely an "at will" employee. This means you could be terminated for any reason, or no reason at all, at any time so long as it isn't based on discriminatory reasons (i.e. because of race, sex, national origin or another protected classification), or your having engaged in a protected activity, or in violation of the terms of a contract or collective bargaining agreement, Therefore, you could be terminated for "burning leads" and you won't have any recourse. Sorry...
THESE COMMENTS MUST NOT BE CONSIDERED LEGAL ADVICE. Comments made on websites such as Avvo.com are provided for information purposes only, and you should not base a decision to act or refrain from acting based upon this answer. The only way to determine how the law may apply to your particular situation is to consult with an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. Answering this question does not create an attorney-client relationship or otherwise require further consultation. . That relationship is established by the execution of a written agreement for legal services. Also, see Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference
While not the best practice, firing someone over the intercomm is not illegal. Moreover, employers have a qualified privileged to make statements regarding their employees that might otherwise be defamatory.
Moreover, statements of opinions are not actionable. Generally, in most states to overcome the qualified privilege you would need to prove that your employer made false statements about you with actual malice.
The above answer is provided for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice from an attorney. The above answer is provided in a public forum and questions and answer are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The provision of the above information does not create an attorney-client relationship, and the above information is not legal advice. You should not read this reply to suggest specific advice or to address your exact circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law.
As an at-will employee, the firing does not sound unlawful. So, the remaining question is whether announcing the fact and the true reason you were fired over the intercom for your coworkers to hear unlawful?
If you were truly "burning leads" - whatever that means - then the announcement of this true fact over the intercom is not illegal. It is not within the "zone of privacy" to be protected from public disclosure, unlike for example your medical information, or other personal and private details.
If the announcement that you were "burning leads" is a lie, then you could theoretically have same claim for slander or intentional infliction of emotional distress. But, more practically speaking, whether these are weak claims not worth pursuing is something you might discuss with an employment lawyer. In fact, an emotional distress claim here is probably preempted by the workers' compensation law.
Overall, this does not sound like a claim with pursuing based on the limited information available.
I'm sorry you experienced this humiliation. I hope this information is helpful to you. Good luck!
Follow me on Twitter @joeroselaw. I answer questions on Avvo to try to help get you pointed in the right direction. But, I am not your attorney. Beware, my answers here are general, limited, incomplete, and can never be as complete, thorough, or accurate as one I would give to a client after hearing all of the facts and details of my client's situation and applying the correct law. Also, I am admitted to practice law only in California and all of my answers are intended exclusively for the Golden State.
Personal Injury Lawyer
There would not typically be any legal claim on the basis of the facts you have described. I am sorry.
This answer is a general interpretation of the law and is not fact specific to your case. Likewise it does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should seek an attorney for a review of your specific facts and documents. http://www.johnphillipslaw.com