I have been married for 21 years in California. My husband will inherit a considerable sum at the death of his parents. During the long marriage we ear-marked his inheritance as our retirement fund. Now that we are divorcing, I have no backup in retirement savings. At this time, we have no savings so I cannot get any lump sum at the divorce. Our incomes are approx the same so I cannot ask for alimony. He is still okay for retirement, but I am screwed. Can I stipulate in the divorce receiving any portion of his future inheritance?
This is a family law not probate issue. You have no legal right to his inheritance, it is his separate property. The income generated from when inheritance after he receives it may be an argument for support, but that should be addressed with your family law attorney.
The general advice above does not constitute an attorney-client relationship: you haven't hired me or my firm or given me confidential information by posting on this public forum, and my answer on this public forum does not constitute attorney-client advice. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. While I am licensed to practice in New York and California, I do not actively practice in New York. Regardless, nothing said should be deemed an opinion of law of any state. All readers need to do their own research or pay an attorney for a legal opinion if one is necessary or desired.
"Can I get part of spouse's future inheritance?" -- No. His inheritance, if and when he receives it, is his separate property. Until then it is a mere expectancy and has no value.
The terms of your judgment of dissolution will depend on the exact circumstances at time of settlement or trial. Since you have a long term marriage, the court will retain jurisdiction over spousal support, whether or not it awards it now.
In the future, if either of your circumstances change, you may be entitled to spousal support if it is not awarded initially. Retain a family law attorney in your area -- you need appropriate advice, counsel, and representation. Your question implies you do not have that now.
I am licensed in California only and my answers on Avvo assume California law. Answers provided by me are for general information only. They are not legal advice or counsel. Answers must not be relied upon. Legal advice and counsel must be based on the interplay between specific exact facts and the law. This forum does not allow for the discussion of that interplay. My answer to any specific question would likely be different if that interplay were explored during an attorney-client relationship. I provide legal advice and counsel during the course of an attorney-client relationship only. The exchange of information through this forum does not establish such a relationship. That relationship is established only by personal and direct consultation with me followed by the execution of a written attorney-client agreement signed by each of us. The communications on this website are not privileged or confidential and I assume no duty to anyone by my participation on Avvo or because I have answered or commented on a question. All legal proceedings involve deadlines and time limiting statutes. So that legal rights are not lost for failure to timely take appropriate action and because I do not provide legal advice or counsel in answer to any question, if you are an interested party you should promptly and personally consult with an attorney for advice and counsel. Also, see Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference
Family Law Attorney
As counsel have stated, your husband does not have the "right" to receive an inheritance, but merely the expectancy of a future potential right. This is, therefore, not an asset. Even were his parents to have died already and left him this inheritance, it would have been his separate asset, by law, unless he had hopelessly commingled it with community property.
You do have a complicated question, however, regarding spousal support. This entails a long laundry list of considerations, among which includes the marital standard of living. This could include the right to save for retirement, if that was your established habit during marriage. So it is entirely possible that your joint spending/saving habits may be relevant in Family Court, but you'd have to present it right and the facts would have to support your argument (and it would still be a hard sell, in all likelihood).
Legal disclaimer: The response given is not intended to create, nor does it create an ongoing duty to respond to questions. The response does not form an attorney-client relationship, nor is it intended to be anything other than the educated opinion of the author. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. The response given is based upon the limited facts provided by the person asking the question. To the extent additional or different facts exist, the response might possibly change. Attorney is licensed to practice law only in the State of California. Responses are based solely on California law unless stated otherwise.
6 lawyers agree
Family Law Attorney
An inheritane is generally the heirs separate property. But you stated that he is ok for retirement. If he has a separate retirment account that accumulated value during the marriage then you have a CP in that retirementn account. You also need to consider spousal support matters. I suggest that you see an attorney.
2 lawyers agree