I am Federal govt civilian employee (electrical engineer). I have been working for 23 years for Dept of Navy, with tenured status. Last year I was cited for security violation for mistakenly taking my iPhone into a secret lab, then realizing it, promptly took it outside. Someone reported the incident, and led to my 3rd infraction. This was obviously a trivial incident, but they proceeded to revoke my clearance. DONCAF has made their decision to revoke, and I am to appeal their decision. But my department is trying to remove my position based on me not having security clearance. Is this legal? Should they not wait till the appeal process is complete? I am already put under leave without pay status since last June.
Administrative Law Lawyer
You asked this question yesterday and received multiple answers, but you did not reveal in that post your tenured status.
Tenure, whether by way of federal civil service protection or another mechanism, can make a significant difference in both the process and the outcome that will apply here. Unlike an "at will" employee, you can be terminated only for cause and only after an administrative procedure that allows you to challenge the allegation by the employer of cause. In fact, the process and standard of proof re termination is very likely to be almost identical to that applicable to your appeal of the proposed removal of your clearance.
You are entitled to the assistance of counsel in your appeal of the proposed termination, although not one at public expense. If you are represented by a union, your union will ordinarily provide you an advocate or attorney. You may need to be assertive and aggressive with your union.
Be careful not to invest too deeply in the defense that the alleged offense is "trivial." It is not the judgment or the assessment of the employee that will determine the seriousness of any allegation of misconduct. That determination will more likely be adjudicated by the standards of the employer. But you are entitled to challenge the truth and significance of the facts alleged against you, the degree of penalty that is justifiable, your culpability, any factors of mitigation, etc.
The employer is not ordinarily required to maintain your employment while your clearance appeal is pending. The employer has the capability to restore your employment and to make good on any back pay and benefits if the appeal is determined in your favor. Ordinarily where remedies are possible if necessary, the employer is not required to abstain from action until everything is completed. But if the time period extends indefinitely and works a genuine hardship, you may be able to argue for some interim relief or accommodation -- assuming that the appeal process is not delayed by your request or action.
Look, with 23 years of tenured employment, you need to make a full-on no-quarter-given effort to save your employment. Get a lawyer, a good one, with demonstrated skill and experience in dealing with your specific employer. Make whatever investment required to fund this defense. This is hardball and you have a great deal at stake. Good luck to you.
No legal advice here. READ THIS BEFORE you contact me! My responses to questions on Avvo are never intended as legal advice and must not be relied upon as if they were legal advice. I give legal advice ONLY in the course of a formal attorney-client relationship. Exchange of information through Avvo's Questions forum does not establish an attorney-client relationship with me. That relationship is established only by joint execution of a written agreement for legal services. My law firm does not provide free consultations. Please do not call or write to me with a “few questions” that require me to analyze the specific facts of your history and your license application and prescribe for you how to get a State license. Send me an email to schedule a paid Consultation for that kind of information, direction, and assistance. My law firm presently accepts cases involving State and federal licenses and permits; discipline against State and federal licenses; and disciplinary and academic challenges to universities, colleges, boarding schools, and private schools. We take cases of wrongful termination or employment discrimination only if the claims involve peace officers, universities or colleges.
1 found this helpful
1 lawyer agrees