Can an incumbent candidate use the Phrase "Re-Elect" to District 4, IF (due to re-districting) he was never elected to that Dist

This is a City Council race. The candidate using the phrase was the incumbent of the former District 2 and elected to that position. As a result of a heavily gerrymandered redistricting, he became the District 4 rep. Completely different/new district with different constituency. It seems a far stretch of the truth to use the term re-elect. I am a challenger and am considering addressing this with the local Board of Elections. - Is this your question? Add additional information
Answer this question Add to list

Answers (2)

Jeffrey Mitchell Binder

Jeffrey Mitchell Binder

Contributor Level 3
He will probably get away with it unless your local Board of Elections adjudicates unfair campaign practices in a timely manner -- hopefully before the election. You should check into whether your local League of Women's Voters has a "Fair Campaign Practices Committee" before whom you might be able to lodge a complaint. These committees sometimes issue their findings in press releases that are in turn picked up by the local papers. Good luck.
0 0
Robert Alan Beattey

Robert Alan Beattey

Contributor Level 3
It would certainly be better practice to use the phrase "keep" or "retain" rather than "re-elect" given the circumstance you describe. A consultation with a NC election lawyer could get you an answer on whether it's a technical violation. But, as Mr. Binder points out, the timeliness of any redress is likely to be rather later than you might hope.
0 0
Back to Search Results

Ask a Question

Get free answers from real lawyers.