Can a judge be held responsible for illegal deletion of transcripts.

Asked 10 months ago - Tucson, AZ

Can a judge be held liable for the illegal deletion and altering of federal court transcripts. I understand that a judge should be free to make an unbiased decision. In this case the court transcripts have been altered in an attempt to deny an appeal. The information that was deleted would have caused my case to be overturned. The appellate attorney that I had was useless. The judge has known that the transcripts were illegally altered because I filed numerous motions including a Motion 2255 with the complaint that the transcripts were altered. Can a judge be liable for failing to provide an attorney for me after I fired the one that was assigned to me. She failed to impeach witnesses and was in collusion with the prosecutor to allow perjured irrelevant testimony which was prejudicial

Additional information

Either the judge did not carefully read the Moton 2255 or he was a part of the illegal deletion of the records. The judge also entered into an ex parte communications about not allowing information into the hearing that would have acquitted me when I was forced to represent myself. There is case law that the defendant is to be present at all times during the hearings except in rare instances. I was forced to either deal with an incompetent attorney or represent myself. In either instance it was detrimental to my case. The judge respond to the 2255 with comments that I was wasting the court's time and that I would be sanctioned if I filed another motion. The judge also signed a bogus revocation that read that I failed to program. I was never ordered to program.

Attorney answers (4)

  1. Rixon Charles Rafter III

    Contributor Level 20

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    Answered . Judges enjoy absolute immunity in suits against them for actions taken within the scope of their judicial duties.

    NOT LEGAL ADVICE. FOR EDUCATION AND INFORMATION ONLY. DO NOT RELY ON ANY ADVICE YOU RECEIVE FROM ME OR ANY OTHER... more
  2. Andrew Lawrence Weitz

    Pro

    Contributor Level 17

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    Answered . 18 USC 2255 is a statute dealing with bringing a personal injury suit if you are a victim of the violation of at least 1 of 14 separate sections of Title 18. (28 USC 2255 is a statute dealing with reduction of sentences.) You can get costs and attorney's fees if you win. I can see why you would want this statute to apply.

    You say you made many motions, including one for the applicability of 2255. Apparently, the judge found many, if not all of your motions to be frivolous and sanctioned you by making you seek permission before making another motion.

    As for tampering with the transcript, well, that just not possible. There is no traditional stenographer who types on a stenotype in federal court. Rather, there is a clerk/stenographer who dictates onto tape or electronic media. The transcript is only produced in response to a request from one of the lawyers (the court will get a courtesy copy). Your theory suggests that this judge edited the tape or digital file, which is not just sitting around, and edited it so skillfully that the transcript was seamlessly and coherently reassembled after being scrubbed of all evidence that would support an appeal. While federal judges are appointed for life, they may be impeached. What is so special about this case that a judge would risk his lifetime appointment? This tampering practice is about as common as unicorns.

    You also contend that the judge, prosecutor and your lawyer are conspiring against you and the appellate attorney is incompetent. Notwithstanding the fact that this is a disbarrable offense for the lawyers and an impeachable offense for the judge, it simply does not happen. Ask yourself, what is the upside there.

    So, to recap, frivolous motion practice led to sanctions, your lawyer was incompetent and conspired against you, you fired your (incompetent) lawyer and wanted the judge to find you a new lawyer (only for indigent defendants in criminal cases), your appellate lawyer was incompetent, the judge was committing a crime to screw you, and the prosecutor was against you (oh, wait a minute, you got that one right). The more likely scenario is that these people weren't telling you what you wanted to hear so you became frustrated and lost perspective. Take a step back and take a deep breath and try to look at all of this as if you weren't involved. You may see that it's your case that is lacking (not you), and not all the other people involved.

    We are serious lawyers for the seriously injured. I am a co-author of WEITZ ON AUTOMOBILE LITIGATION: THE NO... more
  3. Jeffrey Lewis

    Pro

    Contributor Level 11

    Answered . Judges may not be sued. In addition, Federal Judges are appointed for life. Based on the facts that you have described, I do not see any legal remedy for what has occurred. Unless this is a criminal law matter, there is no obligation of the court to appoint an attorney for you. If this was a criminal law matter, and the court failed to appoint a new attorney for you and you were entitled to receive one, that might be an issue you could raise in a habeas petition. You might want to consult with an appellate law specialist in your area to be sure.

    Transmission of the information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client... more
  4. Samuel Cohen

    Contributor Level 20

    Answered . You raise a number of issues that can only be addressed by a qualified attorney. Schedule an appointment to meet with one immediately.

    The information provided is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be legal advice. I am... more

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.

 

Ask now

30,898 answers this week

3,265 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

30,898 answers this week

3,265 attorneys answering