I worked for a company that ran out of money and let me go. The owner said that he would see if I could work for a company he is trying to merge with and asked me to agree write the following after I was laid off:
"I agree not to take a direct consulting or employment offer from ------, and would work and get paid through you."
Now the other company doesn't want to work with me if they have to go through my former employer, they're ready to hire me but don't want to deal with my original company. I don't want to betray my former employer, but I also need a pay check.
Employment / Labor Attorney
Take the new job without the conditions. If you are collecting unemployment benefits, this could create problems with the EDD as to your employment status. Even though you will not be collecting unemployment when you start your new job, the EDD can still look back to see if you would have to repay any money obtained fraudulently. This is not likely, but it is best for you to avoid your old employer. You can be thankful to your old employer for finding you the new position without sacrificing yourself out of a misguided sense of loyalty. It sounds like your old employer thinks it would be to his advantage to have you as an employee in his efforts to merge with the other company. However, he gave up that right when he quit paying you.
Good luck in your new job.
Employment / Labor Attorney
No, your former employer cannot legally do what it is attempting to do. You are entitled to take a new job wherever you wish and to receive the money owed to you from your former employer as well. Of course collecting from a company that ran out of money may be difficult, but given that dynamic, why would you ever agree to continue to get paid from that broke company?
You can proceed against your former company to get the money owed to you by filing a complaint with the DLSE in California. You can do that at no cost to you, so that if the company is truly broke, you will not be out a lot of money.
Good luck to you.
This answer should not be construed to create any attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship can be formed only through the mutual execution of an attorney-client agreement. The answer given is based on the extremely limited facts provided and the proper course of action might change significantly with the introduction of other facts. All who read this answer should not rely on the answer to govern their conduct. Please seek the advice of competent counsel after disclosing all facts to that attorney. This answer is intended for California residents only. The answering party is only licensed to practice in the State of California.
9 lawyers agree
Based on your facts there is no basis in law for the request of your former employer.
The above is general legal and business analysis. It is not "legal advice" but analysis, and different lawyers may analyse this matter differently, especially if there are additional facts not reflected in the question. I am not your attorney until retained by a written retainer agreement signed by both of us. I am only licensed in California. See also avvo.com terms and conditions item 9, incorporated as if it was reprinted here.