My son was referred to the D.A. four times over four years for charges like vandalism and electronic identity theft. All of these were dismissed by the court, not prosecuted, or he was found not guilty on because he was wrongly accused. However, based on documents obtained through discovery, our lawyer sees that my son has a record of referrals to the D.A., which is found in local police databases. When petitioning the juvenile court, can records be destroyed instead of just sealed (due to the risk of someone unsealing such records illegally)? Does a court order for expungement of records cover police reports leading to charges on the record? Thank you for your answers and help!!!
By the way, all the referrals and petitions were in California, and this question is asking into the future when my son does turn 18.
Criminal Defense Attorney
Yes, under Welfare and Institutions Code sections 781 and 781.5, your son can request this for each case (although in juvenile court, multiple cases all have the same case number for the same person).
There is a government form that he will want to complete and submit to the court to request this. It is a one or two page form. The court clerk should be familiar with this form and give it to your son to complete. Good luck.
2 lawyers agree
Administrative Law Lawyer
Police departments, divisions and even individual officers and teams of officers (such as CRASH units) often make and maintain (for years) informal notes and records of encounters with juveniles and referrals to social services and law prosecutorial agencies. These are commonly called "FI's" or Field Investigation notes. These materials are not encompassed by motions to juvenile court re sealing of juvenile court records. I add this information to the responses you have received here because of your description of the source of your information. Typically, F.I.'s are obtainable through discovery processes in family law actions, civil rights cases and other legal proceedings.
NOTHING SAID HERE IS LEGAL ADVICE! Read this notice BEFORE you contact me! My posts on Avvo in response to the public's questions are never offered as legal advice. Do not rely on any response posted by me as applicable to your specific problem or circumstances. Exchange of information through Avvo's Questions - Answers forum does not establish an attorney-client relationship with me or my law firm. My law firm does not provide free consultations. See http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/free-consultation-the-purposes-and-utility-of-free-for-potential-clients-and-for-attorneys for further details on that issue. Please do not call or email me with a “few questions.” I give advice, make recommendations, and answer specific questions only after reviewing the documentary record and other evidence applicable to a specific client, and only in the course of or following a conference with my client in which all of the relevant information can be identified and developed. AND I give legal advice ONLY in the course of an attorney-client relationship created and defined by a written contract for services, signed by my client and by me or a member of my firm, for which payment has been made. My law firm presently accepts cases involving State and federal licenses and permits; professional (State or federal licensing agency) discipline against State and federal licenses; and disciplinary and academic disputes involving universities, colleges, boarding schools, and private schools. We accept grievances, administrative claims, arbitrations, mediations, negotiations, and other non-litigation matters pertaining to employment, hospital and facility privileges, tenure, and contractual disputes. We conduct seminars and training in employment law for employers and union advocates, and in issues of professional/occupational licensing law for criminal defense attorneys. We accept NO contingency work, and we take no matters for which CCP discovery is applicable.