I was questioned and arrested for an assault on a person with whom I had a disagreement over finances. I did not assault him, but we had a loud argument. There were no witnesses and he accused me of assaulting him, and said that I put a cut on his face, which he had previously to our argument. I tried to expain to the Police what happened, but I was so upset, because I have never been in trouble before. I could not answer their questions properly, but I did tell the police that I was not the one who caused his cut on his face. They arrested me anyway, saying that I had no noticeable injuries. The police did not tell me about or give me my "Miranda Rights" during this whole ordeal. Can this charge aganist me be dismissed due to this fact?
Failure to give you your Miranda rights is an evidentiary issue, it may make it a lot harder for the prosecution to obtain a conviction against you, but it's not automatically mean the charges will be dropped.
This is AVVO, a place for users to obtain general legal information to general legal questions. I am glad to help you in any way I can, within those limits. I wish to make clear I am only communicating with you for the sole purpose of exchanging such general information, and nothing more. It is not legal advice, which I can not provide because among other reasons I know few of the necessary details of your situation. I do not purport to represent you in any way, shape or form. Of course, if you would like to seek out my services, and if you are a NY resident, I will probably not put up very much resistance but representation would still necessitate a signed retainer agreement between yourself and I. Thank you.
7 lawyers agree
Miranda Warnings not being read is not like television. If they do not read you the Miranda Warning, it is possible that any confession you gave would not be admitted into evidence. It does not mean your charges will be dropped.
1 found this helpful
5 lawyers agree
Criminal Defense Attorney
The law requires the police to give a suspect "Miranda warnings" prior to questioning him when he is under arrest. Therefore if you were not under arrest when you were being questioned, then arguably the officer was not required to give you the warnings. Typically, the remedy for failing to give the warnings is suppression of the statement that was obtained in violation of the Miranda rule. in your case, it does not appear that would result in dismissal. A simple violation of the Miranda rule is not, by itself, grounds for dismissal if the prosecutor has other admissible evidence to establish a person committed the crime.
13 lawyers agree
Criminal Defense Attorney
Sorry. On television they always have Miranda rights read because it is a dramatic way to burn up time between commercials. They never have to read you your rights. Failure to do so when you are in custody may result in certain things you say not being admissible against you. It isn't clear whether you were in custody here.
See the links on Miranda rights below. Laws vary among states. I am a Wisconsin lawyer, not licensed to practice or give advice in Washington. I know of no state that dismisses cases because of lack of Miranda warnings. All states will dismiss if there is no admissible evidence of guilt.
You should be discussing this with your local criminal defense lawyer. You need one, now.
If any answer on AVVO helps you, mine or someone else’s, please mark it as "helpful" or "best answer" to help AVVO know which answers to show others.
--- Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer in Madison, Wisconsin
--- Facebook Page
--- Talking to the Police - Advice from Lawyers and Police
--- Miranda Rights (and Wrongs)
Confidential information should not be disclosed in this Internet forum. I am a Wisconsin lawyer. The laws in each jurisdiction can be very different. I cannot give legal advice over the internet nor can I establish an attorney client relationship with you. You should NOT assume or otherwise conclude that there is an attorney -client relationship between any reader and this writer or his firm. These comments are only guideposts. They are not subject to any privilege protections. Indeed, these internet communications are neither privileged nor confidential. Accordingly, those using this form of communication need to be guarded in what they write. Because of the nature of these communications the information is general only and should not be relied upon in any specific case. This internet site is public forum, where the communications are not confidential or privileged. There may very well be merit to your defense or position in this type of situation. However, there are hardly sufficient details for an attorney to provide you with some path to follow. It is imperative that ALL of the facts in a particular situation be examined. No conclusion can be drawn from the communication that you have provided. There are some matters that are just better handled by an attorney familiar with the procedures of the courts in your area. Most, if not all, legal matters should not be handled via internet communication. At best, the responders on this site can give you a few hints and guidance. To deal with a legal problem, nothing is better than to consult with a lawyer who will give you some time and advice. If you cannot afford an attorney, there should be agencies in your area that can provide discounted, or even free, legal services. For a definitive answer you should seek legal advice from an attorney who (1) is licensed to practice in the state which has jurisdiction; (2) has experience in the area of law you are asking about, and (3) has been retained as your attorney for representation or consultation. Your question and the attorney’s answer may be used for promotional or educational purposes. Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer in Madison, Dane County, Wisconsin http://addbalance.com Talking to the Police - Advice from Lawyers and Police: http://addbalance.com/police.htm
DUI / DWI Attorney
The remedy for the police obtaining evidence such as your verbal statements in violation of Miranda is suppression, not dismissal. Sometimes suppression leads to dismissal and this is where good lawyering is important. You need a good attorney.
www.JensenLegal.com (206) 617-9173
4 lawyers agree
Criminal Defense Attorney
Miranda warnings inform defendants of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney. They are designed to protect a defendant’s right not to make incriminating statements while in the potentially coercive environment of police interrogation. A defendant is entitled to receive Miranda warnings only when he is in custody and subject to interrogation. If you were interrogated after your arrest without being advised of your Miranda rights, it may be possible for your statements to be suppressed. You should contact an attorney who can file the appropriate motions in court. Best of luck.