Beneficiary designation for convenience

Asked over 1 year ago - Seattle, WA

My mother passed away earlier this year and has named my brother as a beneficiary on an annuity. Her will states that any person named as a beneficiary or joint tenant was done for convenience only and that those assets shall be distributed in accordance with my last will and testament. Am I right to assume then that these assets will be included as part of the overall estate and factored into the division of the entire estate such assets? Meaning if she gave us 50% ea, do these assets get factored into that total 50% split?

Additional information

oops - the division of the entire estates assets?

Attorney answers (4)

  1. Michael Thomas Smith

    Contributor Level 12

    3

    Lawyers agree

    Best Answer
    chosen by asker

    Answered . I would encourage you to contact a knowledgeable probate attorney to review the Will and the account beneficiary designations in close detail. It is possible for a provision in a Will to supersede a beneficiary designation, but specific requirements must be met for the Will to control. You and your attorney will want to review the requirements of RCW 11.11.020 (a link is provided below for your convenience) to assist in evaluating how the law applies to your specific cirucumstances.

    The above response is commentary regarding a general legal question. It is not intended to be legal advice... more
  2. Robert E. Millsap III

    Contributor Level 12

    2

    Lawyers agree

    1

    Answered . It depends. It is a fact specific question that whomever is advising you is going to have to see the documents and the dates.

    A will can control the disposition of a nonprobate asset. However, if the beneficiary designation of a nonprobate was executed after the will, then it would cancel that will provision.

    My recollection is that a annuity is not a "nonprobate" asset though that can be overruled by the Will by virtue of RCW 11.11.

  3. Justin Eric Elder

    Pro

    Contributor Level 16

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    Answered . I agree with Mr. Smith - RCW 11.11.020 does allow a will to control the nonprobate assets if certain criteria are met. You will need to have an attorney read over the document to know if it was drafted in such a way to accomplish this.

    This posting is for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice, nor does it establish an attorney-client... more
  4. Steven M Zelinger

    Pro

    Contributor Level 20

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    Answered . Perhaps this is a common thing in WA but it is not common in any state I practice or have every heard of. I think this is a monumentally stupid idea which is begging for litigation. Obviously it is too late to change it but that's my two cents. While It appears clear from your description I just do not like it. If the will is fairly simple and says split everything to the two of you, I don't see why it would have been that difficult to do a new beneficiary form that splits the annuities 50/50 at her death. It is literately a 1 page document. I hope for your sake your brother doesn't try to pull something...I think you would have a leg to stand on based on the will if he tried to keep it all but I regularly have told clients that as a general rule (and rules have exceptions!) beneficiary designations trump wills....your brother will have to receive the money and then write a check to you which one could argue is a gift from him to you.

    This is not legal advice nor intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The information provided here is... more

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.

 

Ask now

22,917 answers this week

2,869 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

22,917 answers this week

2,869 attorneys answering