As a general rule the burden in on the GP to PROVE that non-isitation is harmful to the mental, physical, and or emotional health of the child. The broad brush swipes you have taken in your post vis a vis the mother do not PROVE any of the three.
Recommend you see a MN family law attorney ASAP to determine if you have any grounds to take action.
I wish you the best of luck.
NOT LEGAL ADVICE. FOR EDUCATION AND INFORMATION ONLY. Mr. Rafter is licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia and the US Federal Courts in Virginia. His answers to any Avvo question are rooted in general legal principles--NOT your specific state laws. There is no implied or actual attorney-client relationship arising from this education exchange. You should speak with an attorney licensed in your state, to whom you have provided all the facts before you take steps that may impact your legal rights. Mr. Rafter is under no obligation to answer subsequent emails or phone calls related to this matter.
Grandparents do not have custody rights except what biological parents give them unless they become caretakers of the children for a period of time. So your son needs to finish his custody case before you will likely be allowed to see the child.
With children that young, it is not uncommon for fathers to have supervised visits at first. Usually these expand in a sort of graduated custody plan. That's likely what a judge would order as well if he went through the courts.
He needs to step up and file for custody and parenting time rights. If you both are on good terms you can most easily get your visitation during his times.
Disclaimer: This email message in no way creates an attorney client relationship between Majeski Law, LLC and the recipient. Responses are general in nature and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult a lawyer regarding any specific legal matter.