Are a private individual's state and federal income tax returns considered privileged information in a civil case?

Asked over 2 years ago - Phoenix, AZ

Can a private individual's state and federal income tax returns be subpoenaed by an opposing party in a civil case, if the purpose of the the opposing party's obtain of the statements is for diversity jurisdiction? Or, are a priviate individual's state and federal tax returns considered privileged in civil matters?

Attorney answers (2)

  1. Dana Whitney Atchley

    Contributor Level 20

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    1

    Best Answer
    chosen by asker

    Answered . Tax returns are generally not considered privileged documents; however, they are certainly sensitive and many people have a reasonable expectation that their returns will be kept private, so courts generally review a request for tax returns carefully and will in appropriate circumstances issue orders limiting the amount of information to be turned over and the extent to which the receiving party is allowed to disclose that information to third parties. An example of a court engaged in the analysis used to determine these questions (at least in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York) can be found here: http://op.bna.com/dlrcases.nsf/id/gcii-7dblvk/$... (the order is dated in 2008, so the case law it cites to should be relatively reliable).

    In the circumstance you describe - the requesting party is either trying to prove diversity jurisdiction or is trying to show that it doesn't exist - I could see how theoretically part of someone's tax returns might be indicative of where that person resides for diversity purposes; however, it strikes me that there is a wealth of other information that would prove or disprove residence for diversity purposes, so that the tax return information would be merely duplicative (as per the material I linked to, the information contained in the returns wouldn't be disclosed unless the information was not "readily available" elsewhere). Also, if the information were not available elsewhere, it might be reasonable to request that the judge limit the disclosure to just the number of the form that was filed (i.e., was it a resident tax return or a nonresident return) and the address that was given on the return as the person's home address (i.e., not just the mailing address if that is different from the home address).

    My answer does not constitute legal advice and may not be relied upon by anyone for any purpose and does not... more
  2. C. Andrew Campbell

    Contributor Level 15

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    1

    Answered . If diversity of citizenship is at issue and the tax returns as subpoenaed are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence it is liklely that access to the tax returns would be allowed. You can always attempt to modify or quash the subpoena, or seek a protective order because the tax returns contain privileged information that is not calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; however it is not very likely based on the limited facts that you provided that you could get the subpoena quashed.

    If there are claims of lost wages, loss of income, or loss of earning capacity involved in the matter the tax returns are almost certainly going to be accessible to the opposing party.

    This information is provided for general informational purposes and is not intended as legal advice. An attorney... more

Related Topics

Small business taxes

Small business taxes include state and federal income taxes and employment taxes, self-employment taxes, and excise taxes.

Small business income tax

Filing an income tax return is required for all businesses except partnerships, which file an information return instead.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.

 

Ask now

24,550 answers this week

2,956 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

24,550 answers this week

2,956 attorneys answering