Am ProPer and confused with discovery. Defendant objects to form interrogatories saying term "incident" is too vague

Asked about 1 year ago - Oakland, CA

I missed deadline to ask for additional info; however I now realize that responses to all discovery (interrogatories, admissions and documents) did not arrive with verification. There is page saying verification to follow; yet no verification was attached. I subsequently asked for additional discovery and found responses equally deficient-but did have verification. 1) Can I still challenge old discovery since it lacked verifications? 2. Tips on understanding if responses would be viewed by the court as deficient and evasive? Thanks

Attorney answers (3)

  1. Ross Carlton Meltzer

    Contributor Level 14

    Answered . You should consider hiring a lawyer to handle this matter. The discovery process is very technical and lawyers spend years mastering this area of law.

    None of the information on this site constitutes legal advice. It is an ad for attorney services. The attorneys at... more
  2. John Noah Kitta

    Contributor Level 19

    Answered . Within the body of the Form Interrogatories, it defines what “incident” means. There should be no confusion.

    John N. Kitta
    Fremont

    If you have found this information helpful, please let the attorney know by marking best answer. Thank you.... more
  3. Alan James Brinkmeier

    Contributor Level 20

    Answered . Incident has two meaings
    Incident = Liable to happen because of; resulting from
    OR
    Incidnet = an event or happening

    Did you define it?

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.

 

Ask now

27,631 answers this week

3,132 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

27,631 answers this week

3,132 attorneys answering