Your assessment is correct.
There's really no need to object to the "additional affirmative defense:" affirmative defense. However, if you wished to do so, you would file a Demurrer to Answer pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 430.20 within 10 days after service of the answer, unless this period has been extended by stipulation or court order. (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 430.40(b).)
Frank W. Chen has been licensed to practice law in California since 1988. The information presented here is general in nature and is not intended, nor should be construed, as legal advice for a particular case. This Avvo.com posting does not create any attorney-client relationship with the author. For specific advice about your particular situation, please consult with your own attorney.
Generally it is a waste of time to fight over the defenses because it is their burden to prove them. They can assert a defenses whenever it arises but certain claims are waived if not asserted initially. You can move to strike the defenses or just wait and deal with them at trial which is probably easier and cheaper.
This is not a comprehensive answer. Call us for more information. 619.797.5456 www.mataelelaw.com
Agree with the other lawyers who have answered so far, but just wanted to give some further thoughts.
This "defense" is pleaded quite often in the courts that we practice before (not California courts). It is very rare for it to lead to any new defenses being asserted, so I would not pay much attention to it at this point. If something truly new that points to a new potential defense is revealed during the discovery process, the defense may be able to move to amend the answer to include the new defense anyway.
These are general thoughts - not intended as legal advice - so you should get advice from a local lawyer.
Mr. Chen is right.
And there is no such thing as a reservation of a right to assert an affirmative defense. The defense is a silly one and meaningless. If the defendant finds a basis for another defense, it will have to amend the answer and seek court approval whether or not that silly affirmative defense is stated.
This answer should not be construed to create any attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship can be formed only through the mutual execution of an attorney-client agreement. The answer given is based on the extremely limited facts provided and the proper course of action might change significantly with the introduction of other facts. All who read this answer should not rely on the answer to govern their conduct. Please seek the advice of competent counsel after disclosing all facts to that attorney. This answer is intended for California residents only. The answering party is only licensed to practice in the State of California.