A question was asked that was not answered. I have a crooked Opposing Counsel that purposely did not notice me on hearings whe

Asked over 1 year ago - Los Angeles, CA

instructed by the Judge to do so. Judge doesn't believe me. So I have to appeal. But the answer we are all looking for is a letter in the mail legal proof of service. Because it is not 'proof' of anything. The fact that the other side is responsible to notify is insane.

Attorney answers (4)

  1. Charles Richard Perry

    Pro

    Contributor Level 16

    7

    Lawyers agree

    1

    Answered . I'm sorry, but I don't see a question here.

    Part of a judge's job is to make a ruling on who is telling the truth, and it appears that the judge did not believe you. I agree that is unfortunate, but it happens.

    I strongly urge you to review your file with an attorney to figure out what can be done. An appeal that simply says "I was not served with certain papers and the judge did not believe me" will most likely fail. Having said that, there may be other arguments that have a better chance of success.

    Best of luck to you.

  2. Malosack Berjis

    Contributor Level 20

    4

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . I agree with Attorney Perry--that is, unfortunately, I don't see a question, in your post, either.

  3. Christine C McCall

    Pro

    Contributor Level 20

    4

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . Here is the problem: the appellate court will not simply decide that the trial court should have believed you. If this issue is truly an issue of credibility, then you most likely will suffer an unfortunate financial result. But the attorneys here are NOT convinced that this issue is one solely of credibility. There may be a presumption in the law that the court was required to give effect to and didn't. There may be a standard of evidence that the court was required to find before making a determination and failed to find. No one can give you an exhaustive list of the grounds on which you may have some recourse without knowing the facts and circumstances in detail. If the present result is truly unacceptable, then scrape together the very minimal cost for a consultation with a local litigator. That will be faster, cheaper, and much more reliably predictive than taking a blind shot with the appellate court on an issue of pure credibility.

    My responses to questions on Avvo are never intended as legal advice and must not be relied upon as legal advice.... more
  4. Michael Raymond Daymude

    Pro

    Contributor Level 20

    4

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . You are jumping to a lot of conclusions when you say opposing counsel "purposely" did not serve notice of hearing. A letter in the mail, by itself, probably would not be the required proof. However, a letter coupled with an executed proof of service (which would usually be proof enough, itself) may constitute sufficient evidence for the court to rule that you had actual notice of the hearing. BTW, the attitude expressed in your question is unlikely to get a sympathetic responses here or before the court.

    I am licensed in California only and my answers on Avvo assume California law. Answers provided by me are for... more

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.

 

Ask now

27,674 answers this week

2,845 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

27,674 answers this week

2,845 attorneys answering