A neighborhood HOA proceeded with the installation of tennis court lights

A neighborhood HOA proceeded with the installation of tennis court lights without obtaining written waivers from the adjacent homes giving them permission to do so. The HOA did send out a ballot to all residents to vote on this expenditure. In accordance with HOA bi-laws 51% of the residents cast a ballot of which two-thirds approved this capital improvement. One of the adjacent homes did not want these lights installed and has filed an injunction with the intent to sue the HOA . Who has the better case? The HOA or the resident? - Is this your question? Add additional information