A guy filmed my act performing with another artist, can he display the footage having breached agreement(s) to share it with us?
I made a series of agreements with a friend, who is also a local journalist. He was to come to our shows, and shoot our band performing with another artist. He would get access to stage/backstage/green room etc, and in return would furnish us(my band), the other artist, and his label with copies of said footage, to be tagged with his journalist's company name. It was a footage for access deal, made, and repeatedly confirmed verbally between himself, and the several relevant parties, for several events, over a period of some months.
Attorney answers (1)Reputation Level 18
Answered about 3 years ago.
Intellectual Property Law Attorney in Sacramento, CA.
The following is not legal advice and should not be relied upon to take or refrain from taking any action.
You need to speak with an intellectual property attorney, in person, who will seek from you certain important facts that you have not provided. Low cost, and perhaps free, legal assistance can be found via the Lawyers For The Arts (go to http://www.vlama.org/ ) or the business or intellectual property law clinic at one of the many law schools in Boston. Call them. Your dispute boils down to determining (1) who owns the copyright in the various videos and (2) what rights (if any) do other parties have in those videos. As to the first question, it sounds as if you intended that the videos were to be "works for hire" such that you owned the physical copies of the videos and the copyright to the videos. The question that begs to be answered, however, is "in exchange for what?" Providing the videographer with "access" to the shows does not cut it regardless of how talented the band is or how fun the shows were -- being at the shows was a prerequisite to taping the shows so his being there was really a benefit to YOU, not to him. The only benefit I gather that may have gone to the videographer was the POTENTIAL that you would publish the video and therefore provide him with publicity because his company name was listed as the producer of the video. This is very dubious consideration, however. In short, I'm not at all sure that you and the videographer entered into an enforceable contract. You simply did not promise nor give him anything of value in exchange for the video or any rights to the video. Absent that exchange, the videographer may not have any duty to give you HIS videos. The rule is that the creator of a copyrightable work owns the copyright in the work unless (1) the creator is an employee, in which case the employer owns the copyright, (2) the creator signs a "work for hire" agreement -- which only applies to eight particular types of works (audiovisual works being one of them), or (3) the creator signs an "assignment" agreement that transfers ownership of the copyright to the other party. None of these three scenarios appear to apply in your situation. Your own attorney needs to evaluate the facts more carefully but at first blush the videographer seems to have the upper hand. As to the second question, because the video contains music (i.e., performed "musical compositions" and "sound recordings") that are each protected by their own copyrights, it becomes a quite complicated process to determine what rights all of the various involved artists -- including the videographer -- have in those videos. You'll have to sit down with an intellectual property attorney to work out those rights. It's well worth spending a weekend learning about music law. Visit amazon.com, query "music law," and buy a few books on the subject. And then spend a few days learning about the business of your art.
Add comment
Find Defective & Dangerous Products Lawyers |