Asked about 3 years ago - Binghamton, NYFlag
The court order states a certain number of days and hours for visitation per week at the mother's parents' residence. It also says it's to be supervised by one of her parents.
Here is the main issue: The child's father calmly said that visitation definitely isn't working. This was said based on what's been observed since visitation initially started. The child's grandfather became menacing, basically forcing the child's father to leave. The father filed a menacing complaint/no charge. The grandfather now demands an apology or no visitation. He's not sensitive to visitation issues. There's been no visitation for 2 weeks now. I did send an email request offering to discuss issues over email. He responded with a condescending rant. I'm at a loss. Should I try once more to work something out?
Attempting to work things out through mediation is faster and cheaper than returning to court. It sounds like you are open to trying once more to work something out and there is certainly nothing to loss by trying and much to potentially gain.
If mediation does not work, you will need to return to court but in this type of child issue, the more you can decrease conflict and avoid court, the better.
Disclaimer: This answer does not create an attorney client relationship or constitute legal advice and shall not be relied on as same.
I would request that some type of mediation with family Court services or a trained therapist. If that is refused I would file a motion requesting that the Court assign other persons to supervise the visit. Nothing is question explains the reason for the need for the supervised visits, which would be useful information
24,941 answers this week
2,592 professionals answering
Don't speak legalese? We define thousands of terms in plain English.Browse our legal dictionary