In re Opinion 39 of the Committee on Attorney Advertising, N.J. , 961 A.2d 722 (NJ, 2008)

Case conclusion date		December 17, 2008
Practice areas		Ethics / Professional Responsibility

Petitioner

Key Professional Media (SuperLawyers)

Represented by:

Bennett J. Wasserman

Avvo Rating: 10.0 (Superb)

Outcome according to this party:

Success

Description according to this party:

(Attorney of Record-co-counsel for petitioners and intervenor/petitioners) wherein the N.J. Supreme Court declared 2 of its own Rules of Professional Conduct relating to attorney advertising unconstitutional as violative of commercial free speech.

Attorneys involved in this case:

Update or dispute information.

Want to see the changes that have been made to this case?

View this case's history.

In re Opinion 39 of the Committee on Attorney Advertising, N.J. , 961 A.2d 722 (NJ, 2008)

Key Professional Media (SuperLawyers)

Avvo Links

For Lawyers

Company Info

Fine Print

In re Opinion 39 of the Committee on Attorney Advertising, __N.J.__ , 961 A.2d 722 (NJ, 2008)

Key Professional Media (SuperLawyers)

Avvo Links

For Lawyers

Company Info

Fine Print

In re Opinion 39 of the Committee on Attorney Advertising, N.J. , 961 A.2d 722 (NJ, 2008)