David Michael Walsh IV's Case Record (5 cases)

Location:
Austin, TX
Practice Area:
Appeals
Defendant (David's party):
Valley View Surgical Center, Inc. and Judith Smith, R.N.
Outcome:
Summary judgment affirmed
Description:
The Texas Supreme Court held that the Open Courts provision of the Texas Constitution is not violated by the medical malpractice statute of...
Plaintiff (opposition):
Eula Yancy
Outcome:
No information provided
Defendant (opposition):
United Surgical Partners International, Inc.
Outcome:
No information provided
Location:
El Paso, TX
Practice Area:
Appeals
Defendant (David's party):
Kerry Evans, M.D.
Outcome:
Summary judgment affirmed
Description:
The Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment based on a lack of evidence showing that the Defendants' conduct proximately caused the death and...
Defendant (opposition):
Woodville Health Care Center
Outcome:
No information provided
Plaintiff (opposition):
Martha Gray, et al
Outcome:
No information provided
Location:
Dallas, TX
Practice Area:
Appeals
Defendant (David's party):
Kanti Agrawal, M.D. and Cardology Consultants
Outcome:
Motion to Dismiss affirmed
Description:
The appellate court agreed with the trial court's assessment that the 4590i expert report against the physicians was insufficient because it was...
Plaintiff (opposition):
Patricia Kettle, et al
Outcome:
No information provided
Practice Area:
Appeals
Defendant (David's party):
Nayer El-Ashram, M.D.
Outcome:
Affirming exclusion of Plaintiffs' expert and MSJ
Description:
Appellate court agreed with trial court that Plaintiffs' expert was not qualified and that his opinions should be excluded, leaving Plaintiffs...
Plaintiff (opposition):
Thomas Chester
Outcome:
No information provided
Ferry v. Sackett
March 12, 2007
Location:
Dallas, TX
Practice Area:
Appeals
Defendant (David's party):
James R. Sackett, M.D. and W.B. Carrell Memorial Clinic
Outcome:
Affirming taxable court cost award
Description:
The court of appeals held that depositions on written questions are depositions under the rules and should be taxed as an appropriate court cost.
Plaintiff (opposition):
Franklin Ferry, et al
Outcome:
No information provided