Back to Search Results

Brent William Beecher

Brent William Beecher

8.1

Excellent

Experience 4.0 star rating
Industry Recognition 3.5 star rating
Professional Conduct 5.0 star rating

Find out more about the Avvo Rating

Client Ratings

Not yet reviewed
Former client? Write a review

Endorsements

2 endorsements

Lawyers: Endorse this lawyer

Overview

Practice Areas
  • 50% Insurance
  • 25% Debt Collection
  • 25% Commercial

Contact Information
  • Hackett Beecher & Hart
    1601 Fifth Avenue Suite 2200
    Seattle, WA 98101
    View map

Languages
  • Spanish

References

Client Reviews

How would you rate this lawyer?

If you're a current or former client, share your thoughts (anonymously, if you prefer). Would you recommend this lawyer to other clients?

Review this lawyer

Endorsements

Endorsements

2 endorsements

Lawyers: Endorse this lawyer
Angela M Low

I endorse this lawyer's work. Brent is an incredibly sharp, compassionate, and detail-oriented advocate. Without hesitation, I would recommend him... more

Endorsement from lawyer: Angela Low , Seattle (WA), 13 days ago
Mario August Bianchi

I highly endorse Brent. In addition to being a smart and practical lawyer, he has an encyclopdia of knowledge when it comes to insurance law.

Endorsement from lawyer: Mario Bianchi , Seattle (WA), 22 days ago

Résumé

Licenses
  • 8 years since Brent William Beecher was first licensed to practice law in WA.

See license details

We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.

Education
School Major Degree Graduated
University of Colorado, Boulder M.B.A. 2000
Bowdoin College Philosophy A.B. 1997
See all 3 degrees

Awards
Award Name Granting Organization Date
BV Martindale-Hubbell 2009
Rising Star Washington Law & Politics Magazine 2008

Associations
Position Association Name Duration
Member American Bar Association
Member American Board of Trial Advocates
See all 5 association entries

Portfolio

Cases
Title:
Mutual of Enumclaw v. Archer
Practice Area:
Insurance
Outcome:
Appellate ruling in favor of client.
Description:
Insured demanded coverage that was not provided by its policy. The Court of Appeals agreed with the Trial Court's dismissal of insured's allegations.

See all cases

Speaking Engagements
Speaking Engagement Name Conference Date
Insurance Covenant Judgments Construction Law Update 2009
Insurance Bad Faith Insurance Bad Faith Litigation 2008
See all 6 speaking engagements