Expert Advice When You Need It Most

Back to Search Results

David James Lawyer

David James Lawyer

8.5

Excellent

10

Experience 4.5 star rating
Industry Recognition 3.0 star rating
Professional Conduct 5.0 star rating

What is the Avvo Rating?

Client Reviews

Not yet reviewed

Overview

Practice Areas

Chart?chs=124x124&cht=p&chp=4
  • 70% Litigation
    26 years
  • 20% Contracts / Agreements
    26 years
  • 10% Corporate / Incorporation
    26 years

Fees and Payment Types

Fees

Hourly ($285-$300/hour)

Payment types

Cash, Check, Credit Card

Contact Information

Languages Spoken

  • French

References

Client Reviews

How would you rate this lawyer?

If you're a current or former client, share your thoughts (anonymously, if you prefer). Would you recommend this lawyer to other clients?

Review this lawyer

Peer Endorsements

Endorsements

1 endorsement


John J. Tollefsen

I endorse this lawyer's work.

Endorsement from lawyer: John Tollefsen , Seattle (WA), About 4 years ago

Résumé

 

License

25 years since David James Lawyer was first licensed to practice law.

State License status Year acquired Last updated by Avvo
Washington Active 1986 01/31/2012

We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.

Work Experience

Position Duration
President at Inslee Best Doezie & Ryder, P.S. 2007–present

Education

School Major Degree Graduated
Seattle University School of Law Law Juris Doctor, Magna Cum Laude 1986
St John's University Philosophy Bachelor of Arts, Magna Cum Laude 1982

Awards

Award Name Granting Organization Date
A/V Rating 2000
Nominee 1998
See all 4 awards

Associations

Position Association Name Duration
Member East King County Bar Association 1986-2007
Member King County Bar Association 1986-2007
See all 4 association entries

Portfolio

Publications

Article Publication Date
Landlord Tenant Liability for Injuries to Invitees WSBA Real Property Probate & Trust Newsletter 1993
Tightening the Reigns on Pendent and Ancillary Jurisdiction University of Puget Sound Law Review 1985