| Experience |
|
| Industry Recognition |
|
| Professional Conduct |
|
Contributor level 19
Practice Areas |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Fixed (Sometimes), Hourly ($225-$325/hour)
Payment types
Cash, Check
|
||
Contact Information |
|
||
Languages Spoken |
|
||
About MePhotos (1)Videos (0) |
Sacramento patent attorney and trademark, copyright, e-commerce attorney. Dan Ballard serves as outside corporate counsel for small to medium-sized businesses.... more View all photos and/or videos |
Client Reviews |
Average Client RatingCurrent or former client? Write a review
“Great job on IP advice”Posted by: Chris, 22 days ago.
Client Review:
Consulted Daniel regarding IP advice on a contract associated with a social networking startup. I was thoroughly impressed with how quickly he was...
more
Flag
“Simple, Informative help”Posted by: a Copyright client, 5 months ago.
Client Review:
Gave me a simple yet informative feedback on wether hyperlinks are copyright infringement or not, said it's "contributory infringement"
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
Mr. Ballard consistently offers well thought-out and insightful answers. He takes the time to address the relevant points and possesses a keen... more Endorsement from lawyer: Frank Natoli , New York (NY), 26 days agoJudging by Mr. Ballard's contributions here on Avvo, he is a thoughtful, precise legal thinker with expertise in various intellectual property fields,... more Endorsement from lawyer: Dennis Morgan , Los Angeles (CA), 3 months ago |
License |
11 years since Daniel Nathan Ballard was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 19
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: Preliminary injunction granted
Outcome: Federal court has jurisdiction over malpractice claim relating to patent litigation
Outcome: Case dismissed
|
||||||||||||||||||
Publications |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Speaking Engagements |
|