Call now for a free and informative confidential consulation
Avvo Rating |
10.0 
Lawyers: Endorse this lawyer
Contributor level 8 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practice Areas |
|
||||||
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Free Consultation (30 minutes)
Payment types
Cash, Check, Credit Card
|
||||||
Contact Information |
|
||||||
Languages Spoken |
|
||||||
About MePhotos (2)Videos (0) |
Mitchell T. Ehrlich is a California Certified Family Law Specialist and is a partner with Lonich and Patton. Along with David Patton, he leads the Family Law... more View all photos and/or videos |
Client Reviews |
Average Client RatingCurrent or former client? Write a review
“Great Expertise”Posted by: a Child Custody client, 7 months ago.
Client Review:
Mr. Ehrlich has helped me on a difficult divorce case. I received excellent advice and representation from him, both on the financial issues and on...
more
Flag
“Super Attorney, worth every penny!”Posted by: Bryan, 12 months ago.
Client Review:
Mr. Ehrlich handled our family case with the expertise you would anticipate regarding any successful outcome from any case!
thank you again, my...
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
 I endorse this lawyer. Endorsement from lawyer: Shannon Stein , Sunnyvale (CA), 5 months ago I endorse this lawyer. Endorsement from lawyer: Gina Policastri , San Jose (CA), Over 2 years ago |
License |
15 years since Mitchell Todd Ehrlich was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 8
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recently Posted |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cases |
Outcome: Prevailed at custody trial, leading to 50/50 order
Outcome: Prevailed on behalf of Wife under which Judgment made Husband fully responsible for tax debts.
Outcome: Split decision on imputing income
|
||||||||||||||||||
Publications |
|