Skip to main content
John W Stanko

John Stanko’s Legal Cases

39 total

  • People v. LT

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Dec 18, 2012
    Outcome:
    Case Dismissed
    Description:
    Marin County case. Hit and run. Charges dismissed!
  • People v. J.Z.

    Practice Area:
    Speeding & Traffic Ticket
    Date:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Outcome:
    Case dismissed.
    Description:
    Speeding ticket in violation of Vehicle Code section 22350 dismissed. Radar case in Marin County.
  • People v. M.M.

    Practice Area:
    Speeding & Traffic Ticket
    Date:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Outcome:
    Case dismissed
    Description:
    Alleged violation of Vehicle Code section 23111, discharging or throwing a lighted cigarette from a vehicle.
  • People v. J.B.

    Practice Area:
    Speeding & Traffic Ticket
    Date:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Outcome:
    Dismissed
    Description:
    Out of town visitor to the Bay Area charged with speeding, Vehicle Code section 22349(a).
  • People v. D.J.

    Practice Area:
    Speeding & Traffic Ticket
    Date:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Outcome:
    Case Dismissed
    Description:
    West Marin speeding ticket. Motorcycle rider cited for a violation of basic speed law based on radar.
  • People v. S.L.

    Practice Area:
    Speeding & Traffic Ticket
    Date:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Outcome:
    Dismissed
    Description:
    Possession of Marijuana in a car case. Case was dismissed at court trial in Fairfield, Solano County.
  • People v. MR

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Oct 16, 2013
    Outcome:
    Case Dismissed
    Description:
    Under 21 year old client with a dui, charged violation of vehicle code section 23140. Case Dismissed.
  • DMV v. T. F.

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Apr 09, 2014
    Outcome:
    License Suspension set aside
    Description:
    DMV administrative per se hearing on a 1st offense DUI. Client's administrative suspension is set aside, Mr. Stanko saves client's license. Records concerning the breath test indicated that the machine was reading high on accuracy checks and Mr. Stanko pointed out that relevant case law required the DMV to set aside the suspension because there was no presumption that the alleged breath alcohol results were reliable.
  • DMV v. I.G.

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Apr 10, 2014
    Outcome:
    Client's license is not suspend
    Description:
    DMV administrative suspension is set aside on client's 1st offense DUI. Mr. Stanko argues, based on U.S. v. Colin, and the mobile video recording of the traffic stop that there was no pronounced or substantial weaving to justify the traffic stop. The DMV agrees with MR. Stanko that there was no cause to believe the client was DUI. Client's license is saved!