Skip to main content
Avvo Advisor

Stop searching and get answers.

Talk to an Avvo-vetted lawyer on the phone now. 15-min call for just $39.

Learn more

Client reviews

Not yet reviewed

Practice Areas


  1. Litigation: 45%
  2. Lawsuits & Disputes: 45%
  3. Insurance: 10%


Payment Types:

Cash, Check, Credit Card

Attorney Endorsements

1 total 

  • David John Tappeiner

    I highly endorse this lawyer. Jared is a top notch attorney with great ethical standards,


    David Tappeiner Business Attorney
    Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

Contact Info

112 E Victoria St
Santa Barbara, CA, 93101



Professional Misconduct

We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
Avvo Contributions
Legal Answers
Award NameGrantorDate Granted
Rising StarSuper Lawyers2007
Rising StarSuper Lawyers2006
Rising StarSuper Lawyers2005
Rising StarSuper Lawyers2004
Work Experience
TitleCompany NameDuration
PartnerMullen & Henzell L.L.P.2006 - Present
Association NamePosition NameDuration
William M. Gordon Inns of CourtMaster2014 - Present
Central District Court of CaliforniaMediation Panel2014 - Present
American Bar Associationmember2013 - Present
Page Youth CenterBoard2013 - Present
Santa Barbara BarristersMember2008 - Present
State of California Bar AssociationMemberN/A
Los Angeles Complex Inns of CourtMemberN/A
Association Business Trial LawyersMemberN/A
Transportation Lawyers AssociationMemberN/A
Association of Southern California Defense CounselMemberN/A
Santa Barbara County Bar AssociationMemberN/A
Legal Cases
Case NameOutcome
Akin v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 140 Cal.App.4th 291 (2006)Dismissal Affirmed on Appeal
Artemis v. Craters & Freighters S. Chi., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131132 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2010)Dismissal
LG Infocomm U.S.A., Inc. v. Euler Am. Credit Indem. Co., 419 F.Supp.2d 1248 (S.D. Cal. 2005)Summary judgment
See all Legal Cases 
Publication NameTitleDate
20-9 Mealey’s Litig. Rep. Ins. Bad Faith (Sept. 5, 2006) 19Akin v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London: A Policyholder Contesting an Insurer’s Unilateral Rescission Must Choose Between Disaffirming or Enforcing the Policy2006
19-4 Mealey’s Litig. Rep. Ins. Bad Faith 16 (June 21, 2005), 4-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Cal. Ins. 18 (June 2005)Insurers and Coverage Counsel Need to Accurately Represent the Material Terms of a Liability Insurance Policy to Policy Claimants2005
3-6 Mealey's Cal. Sec. 17200 Rep. 20 (February 2005), 4-7 Mealey’s Litig. Rep. Cal. Ins. 17 (January 2005)When is Restitution Appropriate? A Defense Perspective on The Battle Over Property Rights2005
School NameMajorDegreeGraduated
Loyola Law SchoolLawJD - Juris Doctor1994
Princeton UnivPsychologyA.B.1989
Speaking Engagements
Conference NameTitleDate
Diversity Jurisdiction and Removal to Federal CourtApplying the Supreme Court's Nerve Center Test to Complex Corporate Structures and Navigating Nuances of Removal2011
Federal Jurisdiction Diversity and Removal ComplexitiesStrategic Issues for Removal Jurisdiction Based on Diversity2010
Insurer's Duty to Defend: Resolving Cost Issues; Strategies for Defense Cost Reimbursement and AllocationInsurance; Duty to Defend2009
Mealeys California Section 17200 ConferenceRestitution Damages2004