Expert Advice When You Need It Most

Sean O'Neill

Sean O'Neill

8.7

Excellent

10

Experience 4.5 star rating
Industry Recognition 3.0 star rating
Professional Conduct 5.0 star rating

What is the Avvo Rating?

Client Reviews

Not yet reviewed
No professional misconduct found.

Overview

Practice Areas

Chart?chs=124x124&cht=p&chp=4
  • 70% Patent Application
    12 years, 200 cases
  • 10% Trademark Application
    12 years, 20 cases
  • 5% Trademark Infringement
    9 years, 5 cases
  • 5% Patent Infringement
    12 years, 10 cases
Show all areas of practice

Contact Information

About Me

Photos (0)

Videos (0)

Novatech IP Law focuses on patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secret prosecution and litigation. Our firm represents a wide range of public and private... more

References

Client Reviews

How would you rate this lawyer?

If you're a current or former client, share your thoughts (anonymously, if you prefer). Would you recommend this lawyer to other clients?

Review this lawyer

Peer Endorsements

Endorse a fellow lawyer, get more visits to your profile

In addition to providing a simple way to express your gratitude to fellow lawyers, any time you add an endorsement to a peer's profile, a link to your profile will appear on it.

Endorse this lawyer

Résumé

 

License

11 years since Sean O'Neill was first licensed to practice law.

State License status Year acquired Last updated by Avvo
California Active 2001 11/07/2011

We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.

Work Experience

Position Duration
Managing Partner at Novatech IP Law 2008–present

Education

School Major Degree Graduated
Chapman University School of Law Law JD - Juris Doctor 2000
Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Engineering BS - Bachelor of Science 1983

Associations

Position Association Name Duration
Director Orange County Patent Law Association 2008-present

Portfolio

Publications

Article Publication Date
Broad Claiming in Nanotechnology Patents: Is Litigation Inevitable Nanotechnology Law and Business Journal 2007
Step-Plus-Function Claims: Tips for the Patent Practitioner in Purposefully Invoking or Altogether Avoiding §112, Paragraph 6, as Applied to Method Claims New Matter (State Bar of California IP Section) 2005
See all 5 publications

Speaking Engagements

Presentation Name Conference Date
Patents and the Patenting Process Annual Conference - Society of Plastics Engineers 2006
An Overview of Intellectual Property Law Conference 2004