Skip to main content

About me

         The practice of law can be summarized in a single
word: integrity. A lawyer works his entire career to develop
his reputation among his peers and with his clients, without
either of whom the lawyer would not have a practice. It is my
belief that there is not a single dispute that can be created
that is worth compromising my integrity over. Similarly, while
I strongly advocate aggressive client representation (as ultimately
my duty is to my client to ensure the best result), I even more
strongly advocate professional courtesy and cooperation. While
there are hundreds of thousands of lawyers nationwide, the litigation
community is still relatively small and, simply put, there is
more to be gained by maintaining a strong professional relationship
with opposing counsel than to unnecessarily create a contentious
relationship. At some point in a litigation matter the respective
attorneys are going to have to communicate effectively with one
another in the best interest of their respective clients. A severed
relationship precludes this dialogue, and often leads to unnecessary
costs and fees to the client by way of additional court hearings,
discovery motions, telephone calls, and letters.

            Along the same
lines, while every matter needs to be prepared as if it will
proceed to trial, each matter at some point should attempt some
form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). The lawyer who
sits back on the premise that every case will settle (so why
work it up aggressively?) does a disservice to himself and his
clients. Discovery is the lawyers’ opportunity to ascertain
the merits of their respective cases; oftentimes the facts as
you think you know them on day one have morphed into a very different
picture several months into the case. However, once a sufficient
amount of discovery (interrogatories, document production, admissions,
depositions) has been conducted to ascertain the merits of a
particular matter, the parties must engage in some form of alternative
dispute resolution. Ideally, this takes the form of a mediation,
where a neutral third party encourages dialogue amongst the parties
in an attempt to informally resolve the dispute. Many times each
side has a very different opinion of the value of a case; in
such case, binding or non-binding arbitration may make sense
to obtain the impartial opinion of a qualified third party.

a lawyer I have evaluated hundreds of cases, and I pride myself
on my ability to accurately ascertain the value of a particular
matter. This helps me to properly advise my clients. Having practiced
on both sides of the table, as both a plaintiff lawyer and defense
counsel, I understand both sides arguments in working up a case
and generally know what the other side is going to offer in terms
of presenting their case. With my mediation practice, this experience
allows me offer insight to each party into the merits of the
opposing side’s position, and ultimately to assist in moving
the matter toward a successful resolution. I take pride in both
facets of my practice and believe that these complementary aspects
of the practice of law help me to be a better lawyer for my litigation
clients and a better mediator for my mediation clients.

            I provide
a free initial consultation of 45 minutes, and would be happy
to sit down and discuss your matter with you. If I am unable
to assist you, I will advise you accordingly and hopefully can
direct you to someone who might better assist you. Thank you
for taking the time to read this, and I look forward to working
with you.


Languages spoken: Spanish

Photos and videos

322228 1446578311

Practice areas


  1. Contracts & Agreements: 30%
    15 years, 350 cases
  2. Insurance: 20%
    15 years, 35 cases
  3. Car Accidents: 15%
    15 years, 200 cases



Hourly ($300-400/hour), contingent (25-40%), Free consultation (45 minutes)

Payment types:

Cash, Check

Attorney endorsements

5 total 

Are you an attorney? Endorse this lawyer

  • Jillian Lee Ferrario

    I endorse this lawyer.


    Jillian Ferrario Car Accidents Attorney
    Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

  • No photo

    Henry and I have worked on many cases together over the years, and I often contact him when I want an opinion on a legal matter that is based on an understanding of the law and real litigation experience. I would recommend Henry for any litigation matter.


    Daniel Levinson
    Relationship: Worked together on matter

Contact info


6256 Greenwich Dr.
Suite 550
San Diego, CA, 92122


We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
Avvo contributions
Legal answers
Work experience
TitleCompany nameDuration
AttorneyTAYLOR | ANDERSON LLP2014 - Present
PresidentLeucadia Law & Mediation2006 - 2014
Senior AssociateShifflet Kane & Konoske LLP2003 - 2006
AssociateLevinson Bright & Roberts, LLP2003 - 2003
AssociateClements & Knock, LLP2001 - 2003
AttorneySan Diego County District Attorney2000 - 2001
Association namePosition nameDuration
San Diego County Bar Association, Fee Arbitration CommitteeMediator2008 - Present
Consumer Attorneys of San DiegoMember2007 - 2009
San Diego Superior Court - Mediation PanelMediator2007 - Present
San Diego County Bar AssociationOfficer2000 - Present
Legal cases
Case nameOutcome
Johnson v. B.E.S.C.R.Judgment for over $150,000
Syntec Diamond Tools, Inc. v. Tecnomel International Corp., et al.Judgment for Client
Gaffney-Terry v. AMEX Assurance Co.Successful settlement - insurance bad faith
See all legal cases 
School nameMajorDegreeGraduated
Univ of San Diego SOLLawJD - Juris Doctor1998
Univ of California at Los AngelesEnglishundergraduate1993