Bradley A Hall’s Reviews

Bradley A Hall

Average Rating

Based on 2 reviews

Help make it easier for other Avvo users to choose the right lawyer by sharing your experience with this attorney. It's fast, simple, and safe.

Review this lawyer

Lawyers: Use the Peer Endorsements section to provide input about other attorneys.


  1. Least capable attorney ever

    Posted by a Car Accident client,
    Overall rating
     Poor
    Trustworthy
     Poor
    Responsive
     Poor
    Knowledgeable
     Poor
    Kept me informed
     Poor
    • I do not recommend Bradley Hall.
    • I hired Bradley 1-3 years ago.
    • Bradley handled my Car / Auto Accident matter.
    • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

    We hired Mr. Hall to handle a multi family member car accident case. We directed him to demand a settlement at the close of one year. We are now 3 months from our statute of limitations and we still can not get they guy to take action. He is terrible. If you want to hear about how he always wanted to be a small town lawyer and server his clients and KNOW them, don't fall for it. He does not respond to email, is TOTALLY unprepared for meetings and gets nothing done. I would rate him a zero if I could. we set up meetings with him to review the demand letter and each time he has done nothing. We directed him to get the criminal case files...nothing..One hires and attorney to handle these things not to make a more painful experience 1000 times worse. Never hire this person.

  2. Ineffective attorney

    Posted by Robin, a Environmental client,
    Overall rating
     Poor
    Trustworthy
     Poor
    Responsive
     Fair
    Knowledgeable
     Fair
    Kept me informed
     Poor
    • I do not recommend Bradley Hall.
    • I hired Bradley 1-3 years ago.
    • Bradley handled my Environmental / Natural Resources matter.
    • I have previously worked with 3-5 lawyers.

    Two insurance companies were involved in this toxic tort case involving a home being made unliveable and property severely damaged by a remodeling company. The contractor and his construction company were found guilty by the court. An out of court settlement not anywhere near consistent with the amount of damages documented was negotiated for payment of damages. One insurance company made disclosure to attorney of $10,000 Med Pay available for the asking. The attorney did not ask for it. The other did not disclose the amount available. The attorney did not request the disclosure. The value of the house was a major factor in the case. The attorney did not obtain an appraisal of the value of the house. He did, however, attempt to obtain an appraisal of the value of the property but did not obtain it from an expert (i.e. the value of used books was obtained from information on amazon.com and not from a used book expert). There were many medical injuries involved to myself and several animals. I also got asthma from the exposure. The attorney did not get any medical experts for the case. The attorney did not inform me when crucial motions were in process between himself and opposing counsel. Opposing counsel stated as a fact that I had said something in deposition which was an error by the court reporter and had been documented as such. Attorney did not point this out in his response motion. Attorney made factual error in his response motion. When I made attorney aware of his error he acknowledged it was an error but would not tell the judge.