10.0
| Experience |
|
| Industry Recognition |
|
| Professional Conduct |
|
Practice Areas |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Free Consultation (60 minutes)
Payment types
Cash, Check, Credit Card
|
||||
Contact Information |
|
||||
About MePhotos (1)Videos (4) |
Neil, an experienced Kansas City consumer and business bankruptcy attorney , has practiced law in the Kansas City area since graduating from the University of... more View all photos and/or videos |
Client Reviews |
 “Neil is an amazing Attorney!! I would recommend him he saved our house and our marriage!!!”Posted by: John and Jami P, 19 days ago.
Client Review:
My husband and I were working with Attorneys down in Florida at CAS and they were absolutely worthless. Twelve hours before the foreclosure we found...
more
Flag
“Great attorney that helped make our lives better”Posted by: Laura, 22 days ago.
Client Review:
My husband and I had a very difficult case that involved a lot of time and work. We did meet with a couple of different attorney's, but found Neil...
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
 When out-of-state clients or others have needed a Kansas City-area attorney, I have always referred them to Neil Sader. I heartily endorse this lawyer. more Endorsement from lawyer: Mark Gordon , Washington (DC), 2 months ago Neil Sader is one of the best attorneys I have worked with or for. He is intelligent, knowledgeable, and genuinely cares about his clients. Endorsement from lawyer: Megan Leimkuehler , Kansas City (MO), 2 months ago |
License |
29 years since Neil Steven Sader was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 7
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: Decision for the mortgage lien holder.
Outcome: The Court denied the Motion for Summary Judgment however did rule in favor of Plaintiff's request for a determination of collateral estoppel as to various issues.
Outcome: Bank Yard Burger's motion to dismiss was denied.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Publications |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Speaking Engagements |
|
