was contacted by officer from local police dept who left message and asked me to call him back. One day has passed and I have not yet been successful in reaching him due to his work hours and the timing oh my calls. I have a FEELING this may be ...
Well, it is a safe bet that the officer is not calling to make your life any easier. For certain do not speak to the police without an attorney. Contact an attorney now before you do anything else. Until you have done so, do not call the officer. If you have caller ID on your telephone, do not answer a call from the police until you have the advice of your attorney as to what you are going to do.See question
I want to get a theft ordinance violation that occurred in 2013 sealed ( occurred in Illinois) the problem is I now live in Texas, how do I go about doing this?
Some Illinois counties require a court appearance on every petition to seal or expunge records. Others do not. If the county where you were prosecuted does not require a court hearing for every petition then you can just proceed by mail and then, if the court wants to set a hearing you can hire an attorney to handle it for you. Alternatively, you can put the matter in the hands of an attorney from the beginning. Record petitions are often pursued successfully by people who no longer live in Illinois.See question
MY FRIEND PUT IN A PLEA AND GOT SENTENCED WHAT IS HIS OPTIONS TO A APPEAL IN A FEDREAL COURT......COULD THE GIVE HIM MORE TIME
I take it your question is, if the defendant appeals from his conviction or sentence could the ultimate result be a longer sentence? The general rule is that a defendant who successfully appeals from a conviction but who is again convicted after a new trial cannot be punished for taking an appeal by being given a longer sentence after the second conviction. But there are exceptions, so the answer to your question is, usually not but it could happen.
An online Q&A board like this is an inadequate forum to discuss when a defendant might be exposed to an increased sentence after appeal. This is something that your friend should discuss with his attorney.See question
It was a wrong place wrong time situation. I went to the store with some friends, and one of those friends decided that he wanted to load his bag with over $200 worth of merchandise. I ended up with one thing in my pocket, because he begged me to....
First, I should clarify that when Mr. Moscow said that "you and your friends should consult an attorney" he did not mean that you should all go to the same lawyer for advice and defense. Absolutely not. You should hire your own attorney whose duty and loyalty are to you and to nobody else. The same holds true for each of your friends, of course, but what they do is their business and I am responding to your question. Get your own lawyer and do it now.
Next, you should know that Illinois tends to be lenient with first-time retail theft offenders. If this is your first time being charged it is very possible that a good attorney can get you out of this mess without a conviction and without a criminal record. That is the outcome you want if at all possible, and although I cannot promise or predict what will happen, it may be possible. Much depends on the practice in your county and on the attitude of the judge, the prosecutor and the merchant. A first-time retail theft defendant in Illinois can have a reasonable hope for a good resolution. But you need an attorney, and I suggest you retain one whose criminal defense work is well-respected in your county.
Next, please understand that Avvo is not a confidential legal consultation. It is a public online Q&A forum that anybody, including the police and the prosecutor, is free to read and to use. If the police were somehow to find and recognize your posting, and such things have indeed happened, your own words could be used in court to convict you. So, no more internet posting about this matter, and if you can get Avvo to take down the posting you have made, do so. Discuss this matter with your own attorney and with nobody else.
Finally, one more bit of advice on the basis of over forty years in criminal defense practice. The phrase "wrong place at the wrong time" must be permanently stricken, and forever banned, from your vocabulary and you must never, ever, let a judge hear you say that. In a serious case it could add a year or two to your sentence. Judges react very badly to what they perceive as a defendant's failure to accept full responsibility for criminal conduct, and words like that will convince many judges that deep inside, you just don't get it . If that is what the judge thinks, expect to be hit harder.
The important thing is, get your own lawyer and discuss this case with nobody else. As for the future, being a thief is nothing to be proud of. If you have any leanings in that direction, get over them. Consider getting some different friends.
You may very well come out of this all right this time. Don't do that kind of thing again. Good luck to you.See question
I recently got my criminal background sealed got both letters from Chicago police department and Illinois state police saying it was still but I applied for employment and it still came up on a background check.
There could be a number of reasons this happened. Two obvious possibilities are that (1) the background check was conducted after the order to seal was granted by the court but before the agencies had completed their compliance and (2) the position you applied for has legal access to sealed records. There could be other explanations, too. An attorney with a detailed knowledge of Illinois criminal records practice might be able to help you clear this up.See question
Police brutality case. That my fiancee was charged for a murder no money for a paid attorney. And public defender didn't present all evidence. Stated his job was to get the sentence dropped from life to 60 years.
The deadline for initiating an appeal was thirty days from the date of sentencing. The outside deadline for filing a post-conviction petition was three years from date of conviction. Other state collateral remedies have even shorter deadlines or are probably not applicable. The federal habeas corpus deadline is a complicated calculation, but after 23 years it has probably also expired long ago. So on procedural grounds alone your friend is probably out of luck. There are, however, occasionally very old cases on which deadlines have for some unusual reason not expired, or for which some exception to the deadlines can be established. That is very rare, however. I suggest that your friend consult an attorney familiar with Illinois collateral review and federal habeas corpus for a thorough evaluation of his possible remedies. But don't be surprised to have to make a substantial financial investment only to get a disappointing answer in the end.See question
What are my options in fighting this battle with walmart civil demand I paid them off with a check, can I now go back and dispute those charges knowing they were not suppose to been paid
Walmart's civil demand is probably valid under Illinois law, so you assertion that the charges "were not suppose to be paid" is flat out wrong and you would lose your case. If you had not paid it to begin with it is unlikely that Walmart would have sued you because, as a practical matter, it would not have been worth. If you initiate this bogus lawsuit, however, it will be another matter. My suggestion would be, let it lie. You have nothing to gain and perhaps something to lose. The best advice I could give you is to consult an attorney for a serious evaluation of your options. Getting off-the-top-of-the-head responses from an online Q&A forum is not a consultation with an attorney and is not a serious evaluation of your options. Don't rely on what we tell you here unless you don't care about the outcome.See question
I was charged with grand larceny (a felony in WV) back in May/June 2015. I turned myself in as soon as I became aware of the arrest warrant, and I was released on personal recognizance (PR) with a $5,000 bond. I applied for a public defender (PD) ...
Your question is confusing. You start out by telling us, if I understand correctly, that on the advice of your PD you agreed to waive preliminary hearing on a felony charge in the hope, or perhaps with the agreement, that the felony would be dismissed and the charge reduced to a misdemeanor. Then you seem to be complaining because the felony was indeed dismissed and you were charged with a misdemeanor, which was your hope and intention to begin with. Then you seem to say that you pled guilty to the original charge. Not sure what your dissatisfaction is. There is certainly no double jeopardy issue here at all. You were never in jeopardy on the felony because the case was dismissed before jeopardy attached. Remember that in ordinary language, being in jeopardy and being in trouble mean pretty much the same thing. In the law they do not mean the same thing at all. One can be in very serious criminal trouble and still not be in legal jeopardy, which is what seems to have happened to you.See question
Federal, Illinois, and often local ordinance as well. As Ms. Goldstein says, there are exceptions, but they are few. Even in those states where marijuana use is permitted under state law, it remains criminal under federal law and can be prosecuted.See question