Skip to main content
Daniel James Biersdorf

Daniel Biersdorf’s Legal Cases

5 total

  • Spiegelberg v. State, 291 Wis.2d 601, 717 N.W.2d 641, 2006 WI 75

    Practice Area:
    Appeals
    Date:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Outcome:
    beneficial ruling
    Description:
    Obtained expansive valuation ruling favorable for property owners with multiple parcels affected by an eminent domain taking. This was the first decision on this issue in any appellate court in the United States.
  • The Landings LLC v. City of Waupaca, 287 Wis.2d 120, 703 N.W.2d 689, 2005 WI App 181

    Practice Area:
    Appeals
    Date:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Outcome:
    beneficial ruling
    Description:
    The court adopted our view that favors the condemnees and concludes that a notice of appeal under § 32.05(11) need not be authenticated.
  • FFT Senior Communities, Inc v. Town of Canandaigua, 2010

    Practice Area:
    Appeals
    Date:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Outcome:
    beneficial ruling
    Description:
    Obtained beneficial ruling for property owners regarding the valuation methodology for certain senior living facilities. The government has currently appealed this ruling to the appellate division.
  • 260 North 12th Street, LLC v. Wisconsin DOT, 2010 WI App 138, 329 Wis. 2d 748, 792 N.W.2d 572

    Practice Area:
    Appeals
    Date:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Outcome:
    WI Supreme Court rules in favor of the condemning authority
    Description:
    The Wisconsin Supreme Court took the majority opinion that in condemnation proceedings, the government is allowed to introduce evidence of environmental contamination and future remediation costs to reduce the just compensation it must pay to a property owner.
  • State vs. Ryan, 2012 WI 16

    Practice Area:
    Appeals
    Date:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Outcome:
    beneficial ruling
    Description:
    The Wisconsin Supreme Court adopted our position of the property owner relative to the application of summary judgment to forfeiture procedures.