Case Conclusion Date: November 16, 2012
Practice Area: Constitutional
Outcome: Case dismissed. Court agreed with defense that the law was unconstitutional.
Description: Client charged with Wisconsin Vagrancy law. Filed a motion to dismiss based on: 1)14th Amendment violation:Statute unconstitutionally vague & broad; 2) 1st Amendment violation; 3) 8th Amendment violation. Court agreed that the statute was unconstitutional on its face for being vague/broad and violated the 1st Amendment.