10.0
| Experience | |
| Industry Recognition | |
| Professional Conduct |
Contributor level 20
Practice Areas |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Contingent (20%-33%)
|
||
Contact Information |
|
||
About MePhotos (0)Videos (0) |
Licensed to practice in: Wisconsin, 1989 U.S. District Court - Eastern District of Wisconsin, 1989, U.S. Court of Appeals 7th Circuit, 2001 Co-... more |
Client Reviews |
Average Client RatingCurrent or former client? Write a review
“David immediately responded to my Avvo question with very good advice; most highly appreciated and recommended!”Posted by: Joe, 7 months ago.
Client Review:
I am carring for my dear wife of 32 years who has FTD dementia and her evil stepson's who shun her and hate me have decided to falsely report me to...
more
Flag
“I would recommend David McCormick”Posted by: Mark, over 1 year ago.
Client Review:
David kept me in the loop, gave timely feedback, answered all my questions, and advised well.
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
 I endorse this lawyer. Endorsement from lawyer: Richard Johnson , Las Vegas (NV), About 1 month ago I endorse this lawyer. He is extremely knowledgeable and provides insightful answers to Avvo users. Endorsement from lawyer: Gregory Colburn , Seattle (WA), About 1 month ago |
License |
24 years since David J. McCormick was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 20
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: The LIRC affirmed the ALJ’s decision holding the applicant suffered a work-related right shoulder injury.
Outcome: Court of Appeals summarily affirmed the ALJ's decision ordering the worker's comp. carrier to pay for the four level cervical fusion in an unpublished opinion.
Outcome: Aplicant's award of benefits upheld. Matter subsequently settled via a Compromise Agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Publications |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Speaking Engagements |
|