Skip to main content

Olah v Ganley Chevrolet, Inc.

Case Conclusion Date: 02.16.2006

Practice Area: Consumer Protection

Outcome: Consumer Won Appeal; Consumer Won at Trial.

Description: Court of appeals ruled for the consumer-plaintiff, holding the car dealer's binding arbitration clause and arbitration process was unconscionable because it misleads a consumer and fails to disclose material terms of the arbitration process. Consumer later won at trial.

See all Legal Cases