| Experience |
|
| Industry Recognition |
|
| Professional Conduct |
|
Contributor level 8
Practice Areas |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
Fees and Payment Types |
Payment types
Cash, Check, Credit Card
|
||
Contact Information |
|
||
Languages Spoken |
|
||
About MePhotos (0)Videos (1) |
J. Steven (Steve) Anderson has practiced in the area of Family Law and Litigation since 1983. He is a native of Memphis, Tennessee. He founded the J. Steven... more View all photos and/or videos |
Client Reviews |
Average Client RatingCurrent or former client? Write a review
“Highly Recommended”Posted by: Jennifer, about 2 years ago.
Client Review:
I have hired Mr. Anderson twice to help me resolve child support issues. He is very knowledgeable and always kept me informed. In the courtroom, he...
more
Flag
“Integrity & Experience”Posted by: Tracey, about 2 years ago.
Client Review:
I hired Mr. Anderson to handle my divorce (with children) recently. During my initial consultation, I was immediately struck by his calm and kind...
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
I've known Steve for years and refer all domestic relations matters to him. Endorsement from lawyer: Michael Parham , Germantown (TN), About 1 year agoI endorse this lawyer. Mr. Anderson is an experienced family law advocate and is respected in the mid south for both his knowledge of family law and... more Endorsement from lawyer: Justin Thomas , Memphis (TN), Almost 2 years ago |
License |
30 years since John Steven Anderson was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 8
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: Mr. Anderson successfully argued that the requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-2-304(b)(2) had not been met and that Appellant is the child's biological and legal father. The Appellate Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and remanded.
Outcome: The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed and upheld the trial court's ruling that Mr. Anderson's client would not have to pay alimony despite his very high income.
Outcome: Mr. Anderson successfully argued to the Court of Appeals for reversal of the trial court's ruling that the Premarital Agreement signed by the his client in 1976 was valid and enforcable.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Publications |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Speaking Engagements |
|