7.0
Very Good
Client Ratings
Not yet reviewed
No professional misconduct found.
Overview
Practice Areas
|
|
Contact Information
|
|
References
Client Reviews
|
How would you rate this lawyer?
If you're a current or former client, share your thoughts (anonymously, if you prefer). Would you recommend this lawyer to other clients?
Review this lawyer
|
Endorsements
|
Endorse a fellow lawyer, get more visits to your profile
In addition to providing a simple way to express your gratitude to fellow lawyers, any time you add an endorsement to a peer's profile, a link to your profile will appear on it.
Endorse this lawyer
|
Résumé
Licenses
|
-
12 years
since Christopher Steven Campbell was first licensed to practice law in TN.
-
Less than a year
since Christopher Steven Campbell was first licensed to practice law in AR.
See license details
Hide license details
| State |
License status |
Year acquired |
Last updated by Avvo |
| Tennessee |
Authorized to practice law |
1998 |
04/07/2009 |
| Arkansas |
Authorized to practice. |
2009 |
10/05/2009 |
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
Work Experience
|
| Position |
Duration |
| Senior Staff Attorney at City of Memphis |
2008–present
|
| Law Clerk at Fayetteville City Attorney's Office |
1995–1997
|
|
Education
|
|
Awards
|
| Award Name |
Granting Organization |
Date |
| Super Lawyers-Rising Star 2008 |
Super Lawyers |
2008 |
| Ronald E. McNair |
Ouachita |
1993 |
| TN Judicial Nominating Commissioner |
Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey (TN) |
|
See all 3 awards
Hide additional awards
|
Associations
|
| Position |
Association Name |
Duration |
| Member |
American Bar Association |
|
| Member |
Memphis Bar Association |
|
| Member |
Tennessee Bar Association |
|
See all 3 association entries
Hide additional associations
|
Portfolio
Cases
|
- Title:
- Miss. , et al v. City of Memphis, et al.
- Practice Area:
- Litigation
- Outcome:
- Pending on writ of cert. before US Supreme Court
- Description:
-
Case of possible first impression regarding interstate dispute over right to possess, use and sale contents of Aquifer.
See all cases
|
|