Mulligan v. Mulligan

Daniel A. Bachert

Case Conclusion Date:June 30, 2004

Practice Area:Family

Outcome:Client's motion to disqualify Judge from presiding over dissolution case over Judge's refusal to do so granted in favor of client

Description:Husband petitioned for writ of prohibition seeking review of order of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Martin County, Larry Schack, J., denying his motion to disqualify judge from dissolution proceedings. Holding: The District Court of Appeal held that husband's motion to disqualify judge from dissolution proceedings was legally sufficient, and thus judge was required to enter order granting disqualification. Petition granted.