Adam Lloyd Pollack’s Answers

Depending on the type of case, you may in fact have a situation where there is a lack of evidence in your case. On the other hand, there may be sufficient evidence against you, but not the co-defendant. You should consult with an attorney who can review the case and can help you make a more informed decision.

The most likely explanation is that this person has not successfully completed the program. There may be an opportunity to be reenrolled into the program, but this is usually an exception and not the rule. He will most likely have to deal with the underlying charges.

The prior answer is correct. The maximum fine is $1,000.00 per an offense and 1 year of probation per an offense. However, battery is also an enhanceable offense. If your son resolves these cases, he may be subjecting himself to a future felony battery charge if ever involved in this type of alleged criminal behavior. From what you are stating, it would seem like a good idea to have your son represented by an attorney. These criminal charges could affect his future significantly.

I would assume that if you were doing this for a photo, that the photographer was around and possibly other witnesses. If so, make sure they understand that you will need them to verify what you did and did not do. Also, depending on your prior record and age, you may be able to either enter into a diversion program or resolve the case with only misdemeanors. I am not sure where the battery on leo charge comes from or the resisting arrest. I am sure the police report reads very different...

Public defenders can be very good and not so good. That is true of all attorneys. That being said, you would be doing yourself a disservice to hire an attorney you can't afford. In the end, you will probably not be happy with the quality of representation that you paid for if the price is truly not reflective of the work that needs to be put into your case. Before you hire any lawyer, go and talk to your public defender. Find out from them how they plan to approach your case. There seems...

Technically speaking, the purpose of cross examination is only to question on topics raised in direct questioning of a witness. Some judges give attorneys wide latitude on what topics may be explored on cross examination. Once the witness is done testifying the judge will usually ask both sides whether the witness may be excused. If you feel that you did not get to ask all of the questions during cross examination that you wanted to, then you could ask the judge to keep the witness under...

Attorney and clients should attempt to be on the same page because it is hard enough to defend a case. While I understand your frustration with the attorney, you must let your son take control of the relationship because as the other attorney pointed out, you are not the client. That being said, if your son gives you written permission to discuss the case with his attorney, then I would believe it is proper for you to have a meeting with the attorney and get some answers. You may not like...

In Florida, there is a law that allows for a civil recovery theft claim to be filed by merchants that is either for the value of the goods stolen or I believe $200.00. Years ago, I was talking to an acquaintance of mine who worked for law firm that sent out these letters. He had told me that many times the store will not file suit against a person in an attempt to collect the money, and that the client just "hopes" that people will pay. That being said, you should understand that whatever...

If you are found guilty or you enter a plea to petit theft while on probation for robbery, it is certainly possible that you will go back to prison. Your scoresheet would indicate prison to be an appropriate sanction. You must be found not guilty and hopefully the judge in your probation case will agree to a dismissal of the violation. You should definitely consider hiring an attorney.

A victim has certain constitutional rights in Florida. The victim is entitled to give their input to a judge at sentencing. However, modification of probation is not per se sentencing. Probation has historically been an area which judges can exercise their discretion in modifying.