Skip to main content
Adam M. Seifer
Avvo
Pro

Adam Seifer’s Legal Cases

11 total


  • Antonio Stukes v Juaquin Malphurs aka Waka Flocka Flame and Mizay Entertainment

    Practice Area:
    Personal Injury
    Date:
    Dec 18, 2012
    Outcome:
    Jury verdict of $501,000 for compensatory and punitive damages in favor of Mr. Seifer's client
    Description:
    This case was a civil lawsuit brought on behalf of Mr. Seifer's client who was shot by members of a high-profile rapper's security team in Charlotte in 2011. The lawsuit alleged damages due to the negligent and intentional acts of the entourage in shooting at Mr. Seifer's client without provocation and for the failure to adequately supervise and train these individuals.
  • Confidential

    Practice Area:
    Personal Injury
    Date:
    Nov 01, 2012
    Outcome:
    Case was settled for mid-six figures at mediation on a confidential basis.
    Description:
    Client was horribly injured following a horrific accident. The manufacturer denied any responsibility and suit was filed in Mecklenburg County.
  • Cynthia Wage vs. Ace Hardware

    Practice Area:
    Workers Compensation
    Date:
    Sep 01, 2012
    Outcome:
    Settled for $180,000
    Description:
    A workers’ compensation case involving a workplace accident which injured both of the client’s knees. Employer and their insurance company partially accepted responsibility and partially denied responsibility for the injuries.
  • Confidential

    Practice Area:
    Personal Injury
    Date:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Outcome:
    Case was settled at mediation on a confidential basis.
    Description:
    Client was injured following an accident caused by inattentive service by a national car service provider. The retailer denied any responsibility and suit was filed in Mecklenburg County. Case was settled at mediation on a confidential basis.
  • Fehim Delic V. Wieland Home Builders

    Practice Area:
    Workers Compensation
    Date:
    Mar 12, 2013
    Outcome:
    Settled for $190,000
    Description:
    Client injured his back while working on the job.
  • Confidential

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Mar 04, 2013
    Outcome:
    Dismissal
    Description:
    Mr. Seifer obtained an acquittal of all charges for a DWI client based on a violation of his client's statutory and constitutional rights when the jail did not allow him access to family and friends and did not take her before a judicial official for a bond determination in a timely fashion.
  • State of North Carolina v Confidential

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Mar 27, 2013
    Outcome:
    Dismissal
    Description:
    Mr. Seifer obtained a dismissal of all charges against a client accused of DWI, reckless driving and open container on the grounds that law enforcement violated her statutory rights and her Fourth and Sixth Amendment rights under the Constitution.
  • State of North Carolina v Confidential

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Apr 09, 2013
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty
    Description:
    In April of 2013, Mr. Seifer won a trial for a client charged with driving a commercial vehicle while impaired.
  • State of North Carolina v Confidential

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Jun 04, 2013
    Outcome:
    Dismissal
    Description:
    Mr. Seifer's client was charged with Driving While Impaired. In June of 2013, a Judge dismissed the charges against SeiferFLatow’s client on the grounds that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to pull over Defendant's vehicle and on the grounds that the Officer lacked probable cause to arrest the Defendant.
  • State of North Carolina v Confidential

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    May 15, 2013
    Outcome:
    Dismissal
    Description:
    Mr. Seifer's client was charged with Driving While Impaired and other charges. In May of 2013, Mr. Seifer obtained a dismissal of all charges based on a violation of their client's statutory and constitutional rights when the jail did not allow him access to family and friends and did not take her before a judicial official for a bond determination without unreasonable delay.