It will depend on whether Kentucky considers the simple use of MJ a felony. The other military offenses should be irrelevant to that consideration.
Whether or not you have a felony conviction is based on a comparison with state law in your state. The forum (SPCM) is actually irrelevant to that decision. You could be convicted at GCM, but not have a felony and vice-versa.
It is possible he might get in trouble. The AF have some very strict rules about relationships, and also about the use of IT systems and computers.
You would get in touch with his First Sergeant of his unit.
You were interviewed as a victim/witness of a crime. You have not been cited, arrested, or detained by any definition within military law.
This is a common situation where there are allegations of domestic violence.
It sounds like there MIGHT be an issue of service connected injury. Would need to know a lot more facts.
It does sound odd that they did not do a Medical Evaluation Board.
His DD214 is the document he needs to go to the VA regarding medical care, assuming they gave him and honorable discharge.
You need to talk with a lawyer who is familiar with military law, VA entitlements, and Records Correction issues.
1. The military is allowed to prosecute you at court-martial for the same charges. There is no double jeopardy because this was a state prosecution, now this is a military (federal) prosecution.
2. It sounds like you may have a defense.
3. Normally this might be a situation where it is best to refuse Article 15 and ask for a court-martial. However, that's a decision you should make after all the facts are properly evaluated by a lawyer.
4. Make an appointment with TDS to talk with one...
Yes they can.
They do not need a conviction to process you for a "serious offense."
If they try to give you an OTH you should contest that at a board hearing -- talk to TDS at Fort Carson.
If they try to give a GD, then you only have the right to submit written rebuttals, again talk to TDS at Fort Carson.
In the Navy adultery is considered an offense under Article 134, UCMJ. However, in the late 1990's they changed the "policy" on who would or wouldn't be prosecuted at court-martial or in an administrative disciplinary hearing.
Now the factors to consider are what effect if any is there on good order and discipline are is the situation "service discrediting." What that generally means is that the military is most concerned with situations where the people work together or in a supervisory...