410-465-8900
Avvo Rating |
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practice Areas |
|
||||||
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Contingent (25%-45%), Fixed (Sometimes), Free Consultation (30 minutes), Hourly ($150-$350/hour), Pro Bono (5%), Retainer (Sometimes)
Payment types
Cash, Check, Credit Card
|
||||||
Contact Information |
|
||||||
Languages Spoken |
|
||||||
About MePhotos (0)Videos (5) |
I have enjoyed practicing law and mediating disputes for the past 37 years. It is very rewarding to be able to advise people about the law and to assist them... more View all photos and/or videos |
Client Reviews |
Average Client RatingFormer client? Write a review
“You will NOT find a better attorney then Jac Knust”Posted by: a Child Custody client, about 1 year ago.
Client Review:
Jac Knust is by far the best attorney you could ever have the pleasure of working with. He is fair, honest, and hardworking. Jac represented me in a...
more
Flag
“THE BEST”Posted by: NANCY, over 1 year ago.
Client Review:
MR KNUST TOOK CARE OF BOTH MY WILL AND A TRUST FOR MY SON AND I WAS VERY PLEASED HE ALSO HAS BEEN WILLING TO GIVE ME GOOD RECCOMENDATIONS FOR...
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
I have known Jac as a fellow attorney in Howard County for many years. He is exceptionally dedicated to his clients, and has earned high regard from... more Endorsement from lawyer: Jonathan Smith , Columbia (MD), 3 months agoI endorse this lawyer. Jac and I have served together on the board of Howard County Collaborative Professionals (HCCP), and I have worked directly... more Endorsement from lawyer: Colby Hall , Columbia (MD), 6 months ago |
License |
40 years since Jac E Knust was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 6
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and found him not guilty, finding that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he had driven the vehicle.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Speaking Engagements |
|