Call now for a free consultation.
Avvo Rating |
Lawyers: Endorse this lawyer
Contributor level 12 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practice Areas |
|
||||||
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Free Consultation (30 minutes)
Payment types
Cash, Check, Credit Card
|
||||||
Contact Information |
|
||||||
Languages Spoken |
|
||||||
About MePhotos (1)Videos (0) |
I am an aggressive advocate and experienced trial attorney. My firm concentrates in the areas of matrimonial and family law. Divorce cases involve vital... more View all photos and/or videos |
Client Reviews |
Average Client RatingCurrent or former client? Write a review
“One of the best family law attorneys in New York!”Posted by: a Family client, over 1 year ago.
Client Review:
I highly recommend Phillip Kusnetz. He is professional, honest, and caring. He understands the law and is not afraid to take risks. He puts his...
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
It is not often that you find a lawyer who has a deep sense of what is right. Phil,without question, will take a position on behalf of his client and... more Endorsement from lawyer: Neal Goldstein , East Meadow (NY), Over 2 years ago |
License |
13 years since Philip Adam Kusnetz was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 12
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: Trial Court's award of retroactive child support to opponent, which was decided on submission, was significantly reduced (approximately 50%) by the Appellate Division.
Outcome: Family Court Order of contempt which directed that mother of child be incarcerated for her alleged failure to provide visitation to father was reversed on appeal. There was also no change in the parties' existing custodial arrangement.
Outcome: Insurer not permitted to exclude either claimant from examination room during the other's examination or testimony
|