Call now for a free consultation.
516-368-2484
-
Sign in with:
- Sign in
- Register
- Are you a Lawyer?
Quality Representation in all Matrimonial, Divorce and Family Law Matters.
One of the best family law attorneys in New York!
Overview
Avvo Rating |
7.8 
Former client? Write a review
Lawyers: Endorse this lawyer
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practice Areas |
|
||||||
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Free Consultation (30 minutes)
Payment types
Cash, Check, Credit Card
|
||||||
Contact Information |
|
||||||
Languages Spoken |
|
||||||
About MePhotos (2)Videos (0) |
I am an aggressive advocate and experienced trial attorney. My firm concentrates in the areas of matrimonial and family law. Divorce cases involve... more View all photos and/or videos |
References
Client Reviews |
“One of the best family law attorneys in New York!”Posted by: a Family client, 9 months ago.
Client Review:
I highly recommend Phillip Kusnetz. He is professional, honest, and caring. He understands the law and is not afraid to take risks. He puts his...
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
  It is not often that you find a lawyer who has a deep sense of what is right. Phil,without question, will take a position on behalf of his client and... more Endorsement from lawyer: Neal Goldstein , East Meadow (NY), Over 1 year ago |
Résumé
License |
12 years since Philip Adam Kusnetz was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Portfolio
Contribution |
Contributor Level 12
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: Trial Court's award of retroactive child support to opponent, which was decided on submission, was significantly reduced (approximately 50%) by the Appellate Division.
Outcome: Family Court Order of contempt which directed that mother of child be incarcerated for her alleged failure to provide visitation to father was reversed on appeal. There was also no change in the parties' existing custodial arrangement.
Outcome: Insurer not permitted to exclude either claimant from examination room during the other's examination or testimony
|