The Law Office of Stephen L. Barry is dedicated to providing competent, client centered, and cost effective trial counsel to the Bar. The foundational premises of the Office are:
1. That for the client there is no such thing as a small or routine case and the lawyer owes an obligation to the client to never treat as case as routine or small,
2. That the zealous advocacy of a position, within the boundaries of professional and personal ethics, is the most efficient means of reaching a just result,
3. That positive results are often negated by unnecessary costs.
In addition to my work on behalf of other law firms I have a select private litigation practice.
Licensed since 1989
I've known Steve Barry since we were colleagues at a defense firm in Manhattan over twenty years ago and I have enormous respect for his abilities as a trial lawyer. Although I was admitted to the bar several years before he was, it didn't take me long to discover he's a terrific resource when I am on trial. Whatever the question, he's been there and done that and he's willing to share his expertise with me. Steve was born to be a trial lawyer; now with over 20 years of trial experience, he is truly a lawyer's lawyer.
Janet Scully Insurance Attorney
|Senior Trial Attorney||Penino & Moynihan||2008 - 2011|
|Senior Trial Attorney||Law Office of Alan Lamer||2006 - 2008|
|Senior Trial Lawyer||Buratti & Associates||2004 - 2006|
|Trial Attorney||Meiselman, Denlea, Packman, Carton & Eberz P.C.Attorneys at Law||2002 - 2004|
|Senior Trial Attorney||McCormick & Turpin||1997 - 2002|
|Senior Trial Attorney||Caulfied, Heller, Harris & Colligan||1987 - 1997|
|Association Name||Position Name||Duration|
|New York State Bar Association||N/A||N/A|
|Westchester County Bar Association||N/A||N/A|
|Harris v. Salerno||Jury verdict for the defendant|
|Vereen v. Fuller Road Mgt. Corp.||Jury verdict for less than the final demand made by plaintiff|
|Osbourne v. Banker||Jury verdict for the defendant|
|New York Law School||N/A||J.D.||1987|